THE HISTORY STUDENT’S HANDBOOK
A Short Guide to Writing History Essays
Table of Contents
Introduction
Part I: The Pre-Writing Process
Finding a Topic
Formulating Research Questions
Finding Sources
Evaluating Printed and Internet Sources
Reading and Note Taking
Composing a Thesis Statement
Preparing a Proposal
Assembling Notes and Preparing an Outline
Part II: The Writing Process
Audience, Voice and Tense
The Introduction
The Body
Using Quotations Effectively
Reference Notes and Introducing Sources
The Conclusion
Plagiarism
Rewriting and Proofreading
Part III: Book Reviews and Document Analyses
The Art of Criticism
The Introduction
The Body
The Conclusion
Quotations and Referencing
Part IV: Style and Referencing Guide
Presentation Format
Grammar and Style
Common Grammar and Punctuation Mistakes
Notes and the Bibliography
Proper Note Format
Proper Bibliographical Format
Annotated Bibliographies
Further Resources
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
7
7
7
8
9
9
10
10
11
12
12
12
13
14
14
15
15
15
16
17
18
24
26
26
Introduction
As history is a discipline based on interpretation, debate, analysis, and synthesis, history
essays are more than narrative accounts of the past. The purpose of a history essay is to
communicate useful conclusions in a logical, lucid, purposeful, and persuasive manner.
History essays that are mere narratives of historical events, without being analytical are,
therefore, of limited value. Analytical essays are also called argumentative ones, because
you are trying (which is what essayer means in French) to convince the reader of your
point of view. The argument developed throughout the paper must be persuasive, which
means that it is supported with evidence and analysis. This is not the same as an argument
that is merely asserted. Argument that is asserted – though often written using confident
language – lacks evidence, logical progression, and analysis. In order to make your
argument as objective and persuasive as possible, use counter-arguments and counterevidence
to show why your idea must be accepted as the more correct one.
Historical Perspective
Making a strong argument also means paying careful attention to historical perspective.
No matter what historians choose to research, be it politics, diplomacy, economics,
society, or culture, our principal task is to understand the historical context of the issue at
hand. It is impossible, for example, to explain royal power in the seventeenth century
without also explaining the beliefs, rules, and customs governing that society. It would
not make sense to critique a seventeenth-century government on the grounds that it did
not afford its citizens democratic rights, because the notion of democracy was not
established until much later. These types of arguments are anachronistic, which means
imposing modern beliefs on earlier times. This approach is not historical, as individuals
from history cannot be expected to appreciate ideas that did not exist in their time.
Historical perspective also means not making inappropriate, overly moralistic arguments.
We are often troubled by the prevalence of violence in history and are shocked to learn
about abuses of what we today call human rights. While statements about the particular
cruelty, immorality, or injustice of an individual or state are not necessarily out of place
in historical essays, we must be careful to take into account the prevailing norms and
practices of the period in question. Your job is to explain how and why an event
occurred, not to criticize the fact that it occurred. It would be inappropriate, for example,
to argue that women should not have been accused of witchcraft in the seventeenth
century or that capital punishment should not have happened in the eighteenth century,
because the simple fact is that these events did happen. Objectively explaining events that
seem amoral to you does not mean that you morally agree with what happened, but rather
shows that you can understand these events in their proper, historical context.
1
Part I: The Pre-Writing Process
Writing a history paper requires much more than just sitting down at a computer. It
involves a lot of early planning, detailed research, critical thinking, skilled organization,
and careful writing and rewriting. The first rule of essay writing is to start early so that
you have plenty of time to follow these steps. An essay that is hastily conceived,
researched, organized, or written will inevitably be lacking in essential components,
which will always result in a lower grade.
Finding a Topic
Sometimes your professor will assign a specific topic for investigation and provide the
research materials that are necessary to complete the paper. More commonly, you will be
required to select your own subject and then conduct a search for materials. The topic
must be one that is interesting to you. A topic that engages your interest will be more
enjoyable to research and write about, will result in more valuable findings, and will
sustain your enthusiasm for an extended period of time. If you feel compelled to choose a
topic about which you have a strong moral or ethical opinion, be careful to gather
materials that express opinions on all sides so that your own biases do not overwhelm the
paper. The topic you choose must also be relevant to the themes, questions, or issues
addressed in your course. Reviewing your class notes or speaking to your instructor about
a topic raised in class or readings will help you select a topic that will contribute specific
knowledge to the course. After selecting a topic, ask yourself the following questions:
Is the topic sufficiently narrow? If not, you might not be able to do justice to the topic in the
prescribed length or scope of the assignment.
Is the topic feasible? If there are not likely to be enough sources available, or if you do not have
the necessary technical or language skills, think about another topic.
Does the topic have enough probative and provocative value? Because the key purpose of writing
a history essay is to put forward an argument, a topic about which a lot has been written or about
which there is no debate might not lend itself to these goals.
Can I use the subject to demonstrate my ability to research, interpret, organize, and convey
important ideas? These, in addition to a good writing style, are the aspects of the paper that
professors are evaluating.
If the answer to any of these questions is “no”, consider revising your topic or choosing a
new one. Most people will select and reject several topics before finding one that meets
all of these criteria.
2
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Formulating Research Questions
After choosing your topic, form one or two questions that you must answer in order to
make a contribution to knowledge in the subject area. Preparing such questions in
advance – even though they are likely to change as you perform your research – will help
you choose appropriate sources and avoid the tendency merely to narrate facts and events
with no specific purpose in mind. For example:
To what extent was World War I caused by international power struggles?
Did these power struggles exist for a long period, were they short-term, or were they immediate?
Finding Sources
After arriving at your topic and principal research questions it is time to look for
appropriate source materials. Remember to use the range and number of sources required
by your instructor. Many history essays will require the use of both primary and
secondary sources.
Primary sources are unanalyzed, contemporary documents (that is, they were written in
the time you are studying). These documents can be in manuscript (handwritten) form,
which are sometimes assembled into microfilm collections or books; unpublished, typed
documents (such as official letters and memoranda); or published documents, which are
sometimes available as (or assembled into) books. Primary sources are not always easy to
find and sometimes their availability will help to determine or narrow the specific nature
of your project. The internet is sometimes a good place to look for primary sources,
provided that they come from a reliable institution.
Examples of Primary Sources
Diaries and journals
Newspapers and magazines
Census data and statistics
Literature (poetry, novels, and plays)
Official government records (memoranda, position papers)
Artifacts (coins, stamps, maps)
Secondary sources are scholars’ interpretations of primary sources or critiques of other
scholars’ ideas. Secondary sources can be found in the University library and the internet
using various search engines, such as JSTOR, Humanities Index, Historical Abstracts and
America: History and Life, which may be accessed through the University of Calgary
library website under the heading “Find Articles”.
Examples of Secondary Sources
Journal articles provide the results of research on a focused subject
Monographs are books that address, in detail, a single subject
Edited collections are essays bound in a book covering a single subject
Book reviews are historians’ critiques of monographs and collections
3
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Evaluating Printed and Internet Sources
Always evaluate the usefulness of a source before devoting too much time to reading it.
Examples of Poor Sources
Popular history (works written by non-academics or published by non-academic presses)
Textbooks and class lecture notes (these works are not well referenced)
Encyclopedia and dictionaries (good for facts but not for analysis)
Works with obvious biases that are unsupported by reputable historical evidence
Personal web sites or sites that come from a commercial institution
Works that do not look scholarly or professional
Examples of Better Sources
Works whose argument is still relevant (this depends on the subject matter)
Books or journals published by university presses or other academic presses
(these works have been reviewed by other historians prior to publication)
Works with extensive footnotes and endnotes
Internet sources from reliable institutions
Students must be extremely cautious when seeking information on the World Wide
Web. The internet is an unregulated medium and anybody, anywhere, can upload
material. Be wary of websites from interest groups, such as those who promote
wildlife preservation, holocaust denial, certain political parties or individuals, and
even certain types of news. Just because the opinions expressed on these sites are
“in print,” this does not make them true or reliable. Reliable internet sites are
usually (though not always) those with extensions such as .edu (an educational
institution) and .ca, .uk, and .gov (material deriving from Canadian, British, and
American governments). Major news outlets, such as CNN, NBC, CBC, etcetera,
are likely to be objective, but you should verify all information you get from these
sites. Avoid sites ending in .com, as these are commercial sites that can be
purchased by anybody. Never, ever, reference Wikipedia, Encyclopedia Britannica,
or similar encyclopedic sources. Material that appears elsewhere in print (especially
academic journal articles) should be cited instead of the electronic version. When in
doubt, ask your professor about using internet sources before you begin research.
Reading and Note Taking
Historians read source material carefully and smartly. It is not always necessary to read
every word, nor to read an entire book or article if the material you require is represented
in a small portion of the complete work. Good writers will have their argument and
structure laid out in the introduction and conclusion and will begin each paragraph with a
topic sentence. These will help you determine the usefulness of a source or portion of a
source quickly. While reading, take notes that will help you understand, evaluate, and
synthesize your subject. Although some students prefer today to take notes on a
computer, a pad of paper or an index card is best, because this will reduce the recording
of irrelevant information and will be easier to organize later. Above all, your notes should
focus on answering your research question. Direct quotations should be recorded
4
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
sparingly, because they will be used sparingly in the essay. Instead, paraphrase and
summarize the author’s argument. Before moving on to the next source, jot down your
own ideas about the source, so that you can build on this in the essay. Remember to
record the complete citation (author, title, place and date of publication) and page
numbers of all quoted and paraphrased materials. Failure to do so may result in a
desperate return to the library to find a source you should have recorded in the first place.
Composing a Thesis Statement
After you have read and taken notes on your source material, it is time to prepare a thesis
statement, or argument. This statement, usually consisting of one, complex sentence, is
the answer to your principal research question, not the question itself. It is the sole
argument to be proven throughout the paper and all of your evidence must relate
somehow to the thesis statement. A weak thesis statement is one whose argument is
obvious to the reader and does not stand in need of proof. A good thesis statement is one
whose argument is aggressive, sustainable, and stands in need of proof to be correct. Be
careful not to make a statement that will be impossible to prove throughout the paper.
Consider the following examples:
World War I was a conflict between European powers. This statement contains a weak, selfevident
generality without an argument to be proven.
World War I was the result of various international power struggles in Europe. This statement is
slightly better, but still too broad and without sufficient indication of the argument.
World War I resulted from the confluence of various long-term and short-term international
power struggles, best characterized by a series of preconditions, precipitants, and triggers. This
statement contains a distinct argument, stands in need of proof, and can be proven in the essay. It
also indicates the structure of the paper, which is an optional component of a thesis statement.
Preparing a Proposal
At this stage of the project, your professor will sometimes ask that an essay proposal be
submitted for review or grading. The purpose of an essay proposal is to convince the
reader that the project is sustainable, that the sources selected are sufficient and useful,
and that a persuasive argument can or has been formulated. Proposals are normally
between two and four pages long, and might also be accompanied by an annotated
bibliography of sources (see part IV below.) The proposal—which must be written in
prose, not point form—answers the following questions:
9 What is your topic and how is it defined (thematically, chronologically)?
9 What is/are your principal research question(s) and why?
9 What is your hypothesis or preliminary answer to research question(s)?
9 Why is your project interesting and important?
9 What do you expect your reader to learn from your project?
9 What sources are you going to use? Why are these the best sources?
9 Is there a methodology you are applying and, if so, why is it appropriate?
9 What preliminary conclusions have you formed?
5
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Once the proposal is returned with comments, it might be necessary to focus the topic
more, return to the library for additional sources, modify your research questions, find a
more persuasive argument, or even abandon the project and begin a new one.
Assembling Notes and Preparing an Outline
Now that you have a complex thesis statement that needs to be proven, develop an
outline. Sometimes it is helpful to “brainstorm” the topic for five minutes. To do so, take
out a piece of paper, set a timer, and write down everything you know about your topic in
a flow chart. After the timer goes off, look at your results and pull the disparate ideas
together to form various sub-themes of your topic. Then prepare the outline, which will
help to ensure that the paper is highly organized, focused on the thesis statement, and
contains all the evidence necessary to prove your argument. For example:
I. Introduction: state topic and thesis statement, give structure of paper
II. Preconditions (“Long term” causes)
a. Anglo and Franco-German Rivalry (arms race)
b. Triple Entente and Triple Alliance
c. African imperialism
III. Precipitants (“Short term” causes)
a. Assassination of Archduke Ferdinand
b. “48 hour ultimatum”
c. The Forming of Alliances
IV. Triggers (“Immediate” causes)
a. Schlieffen Plan
b. Invasion of Belgium
c. British ultimatum
V. Conclusion: restate thesis statement; why is this paper important?
Outlines can be much more complex than the one in this example and include the
evidence that will be used to prove each theme and sub-theme. Good writers often go
through several outlines before arriving at one that will result in a top-quality essay. After
you have completed the outline, look at each theme to be addressed closely and identify
any weak areas. Once the outline is completed to your satisfaction, assemble your notes
in the order you will need them during the writing process. It might be necessary at this
point to make a final trip to the library to research specific items. Finally, your professor
will sometimes ask you to submit your thesis statement and outline for grading before
you proceed with writing the essay.
Rule of Thumb!
Although there is no rule about how long you should spend in the pre-writing process, a good
rule of thumb is one hour of preparation for each page of the essay. An essay of 8-10 pages
should result in at least 8-10 hours in the pre-writing process.
6
Part II: The Writing Process
There are numerous techniques writers use to prepare the draft of an essay. Some begin
with the introduction and write the paper to its conclusion. Others write several formal
paragraphs for each theme, assemble the paper, and then write the introduction and
conclusion. Whatever system you use, all history papers require an introduction, body,
and conclusion.
Audience, Voice and Tense
Essays are always written for an audience, which is the person who will be reading the
paper. Unless you are told otherwise, assume that your audience is a person exactly like
yourself: mature, intelligent, and interested, with a similar educational background and
body of knowledge but not necessarily an expert. This is sometimes called the
“enthusiastic amateur” audience. Do not assume that your audience is your professor –
even though this is usually the case – and that, therefore, you do not have to explain key
terms or write in a manner that reflects clarity, conciseness, and precision. Professors
often hear from students something like “I thought you would know what I meant,”
which is not the same as writing what you mean. If you or a fellow student would require
a definition, clarification, or explanation, then provide these to your reader.
Always write in the active voice. This means writing prose that is direct and persuasive.
Passive writing is weak, wordy, and less compelling. An example of passive writing
would be, “You should try to make sure that your writing is done in the active voice,”
instead of the shorter and more compelling version written above. It is also passive to
place the verb before the subject in a sentence. Thus, instead of writing “the food was
eaten [verb] by the cat [subject],” write the more direct “the cat ate the food.” Voice also
refers to who is doing the speaking. Be careful to indicate whether the ideas you express
are your own or are derived from a primary or secondary source. Although it is
acceptable today to use the pronoun “I” to indicate your own voice, ensure that it is used
in an objective rather than a subjective manner. (When in doubt, speak to your
instructor.) Historians, as opposed to writers in related disciplines, such as literature and
sociology, generally write about the past in the past tense and reserve the present tense
only for contemporary events (that is, events occurring “at the present time.”) Using
words that imply the past tense infuse a correct historical perspective into your writing.
The Introduction
An introduction fulfills a number of tasks. It reveals your topic and its relevance,
establishes the chronological and thematic parameters of the paper, provides any
7
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
necessary definitions, and states the argument and the manner in which the paper will
proceed to prove the thesis statement. If your topic is one that has been debated by
historians, it will also be necessary in the introduction to position your argument within
the current debate. Although the introduction is often referred to as a “reverse pyramid,”
moving from the general to the specific, do not begin your paper with broad generalities
and rhetorical statements such as “Since the beginning of time” or “Throughout recorded
history.” Be careful that your introduction, and indeed the entire paper, does not contain
value judgments or subjective ideas, such as “I think World War I was a bad war that
should not have happened,” which reveal poor historical perspective and are impossible
to prove using historical evidence. In most undergraduate history papers, the introduction
is one paragraph long, although papers written for senior courses might be several pages
so that the nature of the debate can be explained fully. The introduction is normally about
10% of the total length of the paper. Although many students write the introduction
quickly in order to move to the body of the essay, this is a mistake. A clear, concise, and
precise statement of your topic, thesis, and structure sets the tone for the essay and can
make the difference between “A” and “B” papers.
The Body
The body of the paper is where you introduce each theme, explain its relevance to the
thesis statement, and offer the evidence, interpretation, and critical and abstract thinking
necessary to prove your argument. Essays are always written in paragraph form and
lengthier papers (15 pages or more) are sometimes divided into sub-headings to indicate
the transition between themes. Sub-headings are discouraged in shorter papers because
the result is usually an essay that is choppy and poorly organized. Contrary to what we
are often taught, the formulaic “five paragraph essay,” with an introduction, three body
paragraphs, and a conclusion, is rarely useful. Instead, the essay will require as many
paragraphs as you have themes and sub-themes to develop. Avoid the use of paragraphs
that are too small or too large. Small paragraphs, usually of only one or two sentences,
are ineffective and suggest poor organization. Large paragraphs, of greater than one page,
suggest that the author has not taken enough time during the outline stage to group the
evidence together effectively. As a rule of thumb, good paragraphs are 150 to 200 words
long, or five to ten sentences.
Paragraphs contain more than a recitation of facts. Each paragraph must have “singleness
of purpose.” That is, it must have a central idea, normally stated as the first, or topic,
sentence. It must have evidence that proves the contention of the central idea. It should
also have a conclusion that summarizes the findings reached within the paragraph and
offers a transition to the next idea by showing how the central idea in one paragraph
logically leads to the central idea in the next. Depending on the length of the paper, each
theme will likely require the preparation of several paragraphs, which, in addition to each
paragraph having a central idea, should collectively prove the contention of the theme. In
the first theme of the example provided above, entitled “Preconditions,” the central
contention is that World War I had several “long-term” causes. This would be proven
through several paragraphs (one on Anglo/Franco-German Rivalry, one on the alliance
system, and one on African imperialism), each with a central idea but each also
8
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
ultimately contributing to the broader contention about long-term causation. The next
theme, “Precipitants,” would follow with several more paragraphs. This process
continues until you have completed each of the themes and sub-themes that need to be
addressed.
Using Quotations Effectively
Direct quotations from primary and secondary sources can be useful when offering
evidence to prove your thesis statement. They should, however, be used sparingly and
only when the quotation might be misinterpreted or confused if paraphrased. Papers that
are strung together with a series of direct quotations usually indicate that the author has
not offered an original or argumentative analysis. When they are used, quotations must
reproduce exactly the original author’s words, including spelling, capitalization, and
punctuation. If any words are added to the quotation for reasons of grammar or
coherence, they must be set off in square brackets ([ ]). An ellipsis (…) must be used to
indicate where words are omitted in the midst of a quotation. It is no longer necessary to
begin or end quotations with ellipses. Here is an example that uses the first sentence of
this paragraph: “Direct quotations … can be useful when … prov[ing] your thesis
statement.”
Short quotations (those of four lines or less) should be incorporated into the text of the
essay and enclosed in double quotation marks (“ ”). Quotations within quotations, as in
“Tom said, ‘I want to go home,’ and promptly left,” should be placed in single quotation
marks. Even single-word quotations – such as Foucault’s use of “power” – are placed
into double quotation marks. When incorporating quotations, the entire sentence should
be written so that it reads in a correct grammatical form; there must not be a noticeable
shift in tense. Commas and periods are placed inside the quotation marks; semi-colons,
colons, and questions marks that did not form part of the original quotation are placed
outside the quotation marks. Lengthy quotations – those of more than four lines – are
single-spaced and offset 1 inch from the left and right margins; they do not require
quotation marks. These “block quotations” should be used very sparingly and only if the
quotation will subsequently be discussed in detail. In most instances, instead of quoting
directly, paraphrase the original author’s words and cite this as you would a quotation.
The source of all quotations must be referenced.
Reference Notes and Introducing Sources
Historians use the Chicago Manual of Style for citing primary and secondary source
material. This means using complete footnotes or endnotes and bibliographies rather than
the abbreviated or embedded (also called parenthetical) referencing method used in other
social sciences and humanities disciplines. In particular, the common APA (American
Psychological Association) and MLA (Modern Language Association) methods are not
acceptable for history essays, and writers who do not use the proper method will
normally be penalized. Reference numbers are placed in superscript outside all
punctuation at the end of the sentence. For example, “Historians use the Chicago Manual
of Style for citing … source material.”1
Occasionally, it is necessary to place a reference
9
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
number within the sentence; this occurs when, for example, only a portion of a sentence
is being attributed to another author, while the remainder is your own idea. In such cases,
the reference number should be placed after the portion derived from the other source. In
general, however, it is preferable that reference numbers be placed at the end of the
sentence or paragraph to which it refers. If more than one source has been used, reference
the sources together in a single note at the end of the sentence.
Reference notes allow the reader easy access to the material used when writing the essay.
Historians often work with material that is difficult to access, or that has been printed in
numerous editions. If a fact or quotation is to be checked, the fullest possible citation is
required. In addition, a reference note gives credit to the author of an idea or statement
and also demonstrates to the reader the amount of effort and care that has been put into
the paper. Always reference material or ideas derived from another source, regardless of
whether it is paraphrased or quoted. Ensure that the sources of all statistics are cited;
although these often appear to be “objective facts,” they are the result of numerous
decisions made by an author during the course of research and are, therefore, subject to
interpretation. It is not necessary to cite sources for facts that are common knowledge
(such as that World War I was fought between 1914 and 1918), which might be defined
as material that all university students know before commencing their studies.
Although there is no rule to how many footnotes or endnotes are required in an essay,
approximately three or four per page is average. An eight page essay with only four or
five notes in total is either under-referenced or contains too much opinion and assertion
and not enough facts and evidence to prove the argument. Conversely, eight or ten notes
per page suggests a random cutting and pasting of evidence into your paper without using
your own debating and prose skills and to explain and engage with the material you are
citing as evidence.
Finally, because you will be providing complete references in the notes, it is not usually
necessary to indicate the title of articles or books in the body of the essay, which often
just take up valuable space. For example, instead of writing, “In his article entitled
‘Cleansing and Clarifying: Technology and Perception in Nineteenth-Century London,’
Christopher Otter argues that…,” simply write “Christopher Otter argues that…” and
include a reference note indicating the complete title and reference. After you have
introduced an author by name for the first time, subsequent references should include
only the author’s last name, such as “Otter further argues that….” When it is deemed
necessary to include the title of the work within the body of the essay – which is normally
only the case if you are discussing multiple works by the same author – the titles of
articles, chapters in books, and unpublished documents should be placed in quotation
marks, and book titles should be italicized.
The Conclusion
The conclusion to the essay is designed to help the reader understand the relevance of the
themes that have been examined throughout the paper. It is often described as a
“pyramid,” moving from the particular (restating your thesis statement) to the general
10
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
(explaining why your conclusions are important). Do not merely summarize the paper
and be careful not to introduce new evidence in the conclusion. Make sure that you
answer the “So what?” question by explaining how and why your paper has made a
contribution to the subject matter. This is a good opportunity to show in what ways your
case study or focused topic has wider implications and to suggest a new direction for
research into this topic. Like the introduction and the body, the conclusion is a vital
component of your paper and must not be neglected. Keep in mind that it is the last thing
your instructor will read before assigning a grade. It should be about 10% of your paper.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism occurs when an author, either deliberately or without the exercise of
reasonable judgment, passes off the writing of another as his or her own. A plagiarized
paper will automatically be failed and can also result in failure of the course and other
penalties, as outlined in the University Calendar. Plagiarism can include, but is not
limited to, using a few important words, merely rewording a sentence or paragraph, or
using another author’s ideas, without providing a citation to the original source. To avoid
plagiarizing another’s work, accurately reference all direct quotations (which should be
enclosed in quotation marks) and paraphrases, ideas or information derived from another
source, and all concepts that are not commonly known. Lack of references usually
suggests plagiarized work, so when in doubt include a footnote. Plagiarism also occurs
when an author submits work that is borrowed from another person, purchased,
ghostwritten, submitted for credit in another course, or that has been extensively edited
by a third party to the degree that it barely resembles the original.
Rewriting and Proofreading
Once the draft of your paper is complete, rewriting begins. If possible, set the draft aside
for a few days and return to it with a fresh, analytical eye. Read the paper over slowly –
some authors prefer to read the paper aloud – and identify and correct weak grammatical
constructions, illogical statements, poor argumentation, or lack of evidence to prove a
central idea or thesis statement. You might find that one paragraph belongs in a different
place, or that the introduction does not lay out the argument very clearly. Take this
opportunity to correct these errors. Check your diction to ensure that every word you
have used is the right one. In English, very few words have exact synonyms, so select the
correct word and not one that is merely close in meaning. The re-writing process is vital
to the success of an essay because, when properly and carefully done, it usually results in
the reduction of non-essential prose, leading to more clarity and precision and a taut,
logical argument that has no superfluous elements. After rewriting the paper (twice, if
time allows), proofread it carefully to identify and correct spelling, grammatical, and
punctuation errors and pass the paper to a friend who can find other mistakes.
Rule of Thumb!
Just like the pre-writing process, expect to spend at least one hour of writing time for each
page of the essay. An essay of 8-10 pages will require at least 8-10 hours to write, plus time
for rewriting and proofreading.
11
Part III: Book Reviews and Document Analyses
Book reviews and document analyses are similar in content, style, and structure, even
though they assess quite different types of writing. While book reviews assess books
produced by scholars (secondary sources), document analyses assess writings prepared
contemporary to the time you are studying (primary sources). Both require a report on the
content of the work and an evaluation and critique of the writing by considering the
author’s argument, structure, evidence, biases, and logic. Whereas book reviews usually
evaluate works of several hundred pages, document analyses can assess works as short as
a single page and often evaluate several documents at the same time. Like essays, reviews
and analyses need to be interpretive and critical, although they usually accomplish their
goals in a limited number of words, usually between 500 and 1500 words, or 2-5 doublespaced
pages. It is important to think of this type of report as a short essay, which means
that it, like a research essay, contains an introduction, argument, body, and conclusion.
The Art of Criticism
Criticism, or evaluation, is at the heart of book reviews and document analyses. A good
report can tell other historians whether they should read a book or document and in what
ways they should be cautious while reading it. It is not sufficient merely to summarize
what has been written, but rather to engage with the material in a meaningful way.
Authors, whether of secondary or primary materials, make many decisions and encounter
many obstacles when writing their work, most of which you will not be aware of while
reading. Respecting this complex process should prevent you from criticizing just for the
sake of doing so. Criticism must be constructive and you must be able to back your
criticism up by drawing upon your own knowledge or logic. It is not enough to write, “I
do not like the way the argument is developed” or “this author was obviously biased”.
What is wrong with the argument and how could it be made better? What is the nature of
the author’s bias and how can be it be overcome?
The Introduction
Whether a review or analysis, the introduction should begin by stating the author and title
of the work. The introductory paragraph should also indicate the author’s intentions for
the work and state the argument that is developed in, if possible, one, succinct sentence.
Introductions to book reviews and analyses should situate the themes of the work with
other, relevant works. In the case of the document analysis, situate the work within its
proper historical context by reflecting on why the document was written. Like essays,
good reviews and analyses will have a thesis statement, which is the argument you will
be making in the review. For example, in a book review you might argue that: “In his
12
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
book Innocence Abroad, historian Benjamin Schmidt successfully shows the relevance of
Dutch activities in the New World.” This thesis suggests that the author was successful in
achieving the goal and argument set for the book, while other thesis statements might be
more critical about these accomplishments. In an analysis, you could argue that: “In The
Prince, Nicolò Machiavelli demonstrates his debt to classical forms of government, while
also recognizing that true governance is based on the immediate needs of the society that
the government serves.” This thesis is active and stands in need of proof, which it is the
purpose of the analysis to provide.
The Body
The body of reviews and analyses is used to answer a number of questions about the
work, each of which may be handled in a separate paragraph. While it is not necessary –
or sometimes even possible – to answer all of these questions, or to devote equal space to
each one, the report should be as comprehensive as possible. Depending on the nature of
the book or document under review, additional questions may arise during reading of the
material or preparation of the report that need to be answered.
9 What issues, topics, and themes does the work cover? It is neither necessary nor desirable
to summarize the entire work, or even each chapter. Instead, include a paragraph that indicates
the chronological and thematic sweep of the work, the main issues that are addressed, and
how these contribute to the overall theme of the work. It is important in this section that you
show a sound understanding of the material.
9 What is relevant about the author and the audience? What other works has this author
written to which this work contributes? Are there specific aspects of the author’s background
(race, religion, education, nationality, etc.) that affect (positively or negatively) the author’s
interpretation? Who was this work written for, and was this goal accomplished? Was the work
prepared to advance a specific political, intellectual, or social agenda? If so, does this
strengthen or weaken the work?
9 What historical genre and theoretical approach best fits this work? Is this a biography, an
economic, cultural, social, intellectual, environmental, political, military, or religious study?
Does the author employ a feminist, Marxist, Whig, Annales, or revisionist methodology?
Does the author offer an interdisciplinary approach by fitting the book or document into more
than one genre or theoretical approach? Does the author use a theoretical approach that he or
she is not even aware is being used? Is or was the author associated with a specific school of
thought or branch of literature? Why and to what extent should historians be skeptical when
reading this source? Was there a propagandist or rhetorical purpose to the work?
9 What evidence or type of argument does the author use? If a review, is the work based on
primary or secondary research? Is the primary research based on archival documents or
printed sources? If an analysis, does the contemporary author use personal experiences,
second hand information, other types of documentation, or rhetorical devices? Does the
author’s choice to use certain evidence result in a skewed interpretation? Does the author fail
to consider evidence or works that challenge his or her interpretation? Does the evidence
presented suggest an alternate interpretation to you than was suggested by the author? Does
the author base her or his interpretation on hard evidence (the facts), assertion (personal
opinion), or on inference (informed opinion)?
9 How and how well is the information presented? Is the work organized and structured
well? Is the argument developed chronologically or thematically, or does the author use a
13
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
combination of both? Are important themes and terms properly and sufficiently defined? Does
the writing flow well or is it turgid or technically flawed to the point of causing problems for
the reader? Are there intelligent transitions from one theme to the next? If a review, does the
introduction properly introduce the main themes of the book and provide the argument, and
does the conclusion reflect well on the issues addressed? If this is a document analysis, keep
in mind the time period in which the work was written and try to assess its merits based on
those times rather than the present.
The Conclusion
The concluding paragraph should comment on the overall significance of the work. What
new questions has the author brought up or answered? If a review, what further work
needs to be done on the subject now that this work has been evaluated? If an analysis,
what individuals or writings were affected or effected by the document or documents
under consideration? This is also an opportunity to reflect on the overall strengths and
weaknesses of the work. For example, if the author has placed too much emphasis on one
theme to the exclusion of another, this is noteworthy. Do not use the conclusion to
mention minor matters of style (such as typographical errors). Instead, focus on issues of
key importance to historians, such as the strength of the thesis and the contribution of the
book or document to its field.
Quotations and Referencing
Although quotations should be used sparingly in reviews and analyses, they are often
useful when rehearsing the author’s specific argument, the use of new or peculiar terms,
or passages of special merit. If a single work (whether secondary or primary) is under
review, quotations and paraphrased elements should be followed with a parenthetical
citation that includes the page number. For example, (p. 35). If several documents or
books are being reviewed, or if other sources are cited, use the formal referencing style
appropriate to research essays, as discussed in part IV below.
14
Part IV: Style and Referencing Guide
Presentation, writing style, and proper referencing are as important as the argument itself.
When done properly, these elements of the essay show the reader that you are serious
about the study of history and organized and concerned about your work. Make no
mistake about it: essays that are poorly presented, written, or referenced will always
negatively affect your grade. Most importantly, it only takes a few extra minutes to make
sure that your paper is well written and properly formatted.
Presentation Format
The entire essay (except for block quotations) must be double spaced and written in
paragraph form, not block form. This means that (unlike this handbook) the first line of
each paragraph is indented and there is no additional space between paragraphs, merely
the standard double-spacing. Essays must have a title page, which includes your name
and student number, professor’s and teaching assistant’s name (if applicable), course
number and section (if applicable), and the date. Essays must be typewritten, using an
easily-readable font (Times New Roman is a favourite), in 12-point, 1 inch margins all
around, with page numbers on all pages except the title page (which does not factor into
the page count). Few professors will accept handwritten assignments. Do not use
coloured paper, unusual fonts, or irrelevant pictures or drawings. Do not put your paper
into a duotang or have it bound; instead, a staple (rather than a paper clip, which can fall
off) in the upper-left corner is preferred. When a professor gives a page limit, it is with
the understanding that a page has about 250 words, so a 10-page paper is 2500 words.
Cramming more words in using smaller margins and smaller fonts will not escape the eye
of your marker, and some professors refuse to grade papers that are too long. The ability
to write within a prescribed limit is much more challenging than writing a long, tedious
paper, and professors are also testing these skills.
Grammar and Style
Historians use the standard conventions of the English language to communicate their
findings to their audience. In order to be understood and persuasive, your writing must
conform to the basic rules of grammar and style. Write in a clear, concise, and precise
manner. Simple, direct writing is always preferable to writing that appears as if a
thesaurus was frequently consulted. For example, it is preferable to write that one is
“paid” not “remunerated,” one is “angered” not “infuriated,” one “uses” not “utilizes,”
etcetera. Work hard to purge your writing of colourful adjectives, adverbs, superfluity,
repetition, and unwarranted complexity. Avoid qualifiers such as very, extremely, usually,
and mostly. These terms are passive and imprecise. Essays are always written in formal
15
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
language that displays historical objectivity and seriousness of purpose. Thus, they must
not contain contractions (such as don’t and can’t), journalistic-styled writing (usually
defined by tiny sentences and paragraphs designed to be read by a popular audience),
sarcasm or attempts at humour, indignance or disrespect for events that occurred in the
historical past, or exclamation points for emphasis.
Common Grammar and Punctuation Mistakes
Especially when frequently or carelessly committed, many common grammar mistakes
reflect badly on the credibility of the author. Essays that are poorly written will always
result in a lower grade. Here are ten common errors that graders dislike.
1. Dangling participles and modifiers. These occur when you modify the wrong noun
or verb in a sentence. To write, for example, that “If well written, you could get a high
grade on the essay,” suggests that you (the pronoun) need to be well written, not the essay
(the noun). The sentence should read “You could get a high grade on the essay if it is
well written.” Here is another example: “I saw the Calgary Tower walking downtown.”
Was the Calgary Tower walking downtown or were you? The sentence should read,
“While walking downtown, I saw the Calgary Tower.”
2. Subject-object and subject-verb disagreements. Sometimes called “singular-plural
disagreements”, these occur when you alter the tense of a sentence part-way through. For
example: “We study history because you can apply the skills elsewhere” changes the
tense from the plural subject (“we”) to the singular object (“you”). Writing “John’s
statement of grievances were presented to the president” is incorrect because the singular
subject (“statement of grievances”) shifts to a plural verb (“were presented”). The
sentence should read: “John’s statement of grievances was presented to the president.”
3. Shifts between past and present tense. A similar lack of agreement occurs when you
write, for example, that “King Henry VIII was important because he is responsible for the
English Reformation,” or vice versa. As a general rule, always write in the past tense.
4. Incomplete sentences. Also called “sentence fragments,” these are independent or
subordinate clauses that do not have a subject or verb. Such as this sentence. In this
example, there is no subject. Instead, the first two sentences must be joined together
using a comma to be complete.
5. Colloquialisms, clichés, euphemisms, and metaphors/similes. Though colourful,
these literary devices are usually tiresome, imprecise, and misleading. It is colloquial to
write that “World War I was horrible,” and it is a cliché to write that during World War I,
“Europe was going to hell in a handbasket.” A euphemism is a polite, yet often
meaningless term used to cover up reality; it should be used sparingly. A short person is
not “vertically challenged” and a trash collector is not a “sanitation engineer.” Metaphors
and similes, while not prohibited, should be used with caution. Writing statements such
as “Henry VIII was the Winton Churchill of his generation” or “Hitler was like a rabid
dog” obscure more than they reveal.
16
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
6. Sentences ending with prepositions. Prepositions include, among others, the words
in, at, on, to, and with. These should never be used to end sentences. Often, the sentence
will read correctly if you drop the intended preposition. Thus, “Where are you going?”
instead of “Where are you going to?”; “What time are you coming home?” instead of
“What time are you coming home at?”
7. Comma splices. This error is the result of either joining two independent clauses
without using a conjunction, or joining two complete sentences together using only a
comma. Thus, “The coffee was fresh, I had a cup” is incorrect. Use either “The coffee
was fresh. I had a cup”; “The coffee was fresh, and I had a cup”; or “The coffee was
fresh; I had a cup.” It is also incorrect to separate the subject from the object: “Canada, is
a very large country” is wrong, while “Canada is a very large country” is correct.
8. Misusing the apostrophe. Apostrophes are used only to indicate possessives, not for
pronouns that refer to an antecedent noun. Thus, “the man’s car,” the “girls’ hockey
team” (in which there is more than one girl, forcing the apostrophe to go after the “s”),
and “women’s history” (in which the possessive for the plural is placed before the “s”)
are all correct. The same rules apply to possessive forms of names that end in “s”, such as
“Dickens’s writings” and “Yates’s poetry.” Writing “England was it’s own worst enemy”
is incorrect because “its” is a pronoun which refers to the antecedent noun “England” and
not to a possessive. The sentence should read: “England was its own worst enemy.”
Finally, do not use apostrophes to form plurals: “The Smiths live here” is correct; “The
Smith’s live here” is not. One eats “hamburger buns,” not “hamburger bun’s.”
9. Confusing “that” and “which”. “That” is used in restrictive clauses and “which” is
used in non-restrictive clauses. Thus, “It was these two factors that led to the war” is
correct because “that” refers to an essential (restrictive) component of the sentence. “The
Great Reform Act, which gave many middle-class men the right to vote, was passed in
1832” is correct because “which” refers to a non-essential (non-restrictive) component.
The sentence would still read correctly if the non-restrictive clause was removed: “The
Great Reform Act was passed in 1832.”
10. Hyphens and Dashes. A hyphen (-) is used to join compound words that cannot be
spelled as a single word. The words caffeine-free and mass-produced, for example, and
words that might otherwise be misinterpreted (such as re-creation instead of recreation)
require hyphens. Standard compounds, such as birthrate and cooperation, do not.
Hyphens are not used to set off an independent clause. Independent clauses that are too
distinct from the sentence to use commas should be set off by dashes, which are twice the
length of a hyphen (–). The sentence “There is no consensus – nor need there be – about
this matter” is correct; using hyphens in place of the dashes in this sentence, however,
would lead to confusion: “There is no consensus-nor need there be-about this matter.”
Notes and Bibliographies
When to reference has been discussed in part II above. How to reference is also of critical
importance. History professors will insist that you use, consistently and correctly, the
17
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
referencing format for notes and the bibliography that is described in the Chicago
Manual of Style. Referencing methods used in other disciplines – such as APA, MLA,
etc. – are not appropriate in History and will result in a lower grade or, possibly, a refusal
to grade the essay until the proper format has been adopted. The remainder of this part
will provide explanations and examples of proper notation and bibliographical formats.
Proper Note Format
Footnotes (at the bottom of each page) and endnotes (placed at the end of the essay
before the bibliography) in history essays differ only in their placement. You can use
either footnotes or endnotes (not both) in your essay, although professors generally prefer
footnotes for ease of access. These notes should be numbered consecutively from the
beginning of the paper; do not use Roman numerals or special characters and do not
begin the numbering again with each page or section. All computer word-processing
programs have built-in footnote and endnote functions that make it easy to number and
place notes, and to add or delete notes throughout the writing and rewriting processes.
Notes must include all information necessary to locate the source easily. This might
include author(s), title and subtitle, name of editor(s) and/or translator(s), edition or
volume number, publisher and place and date of publication, and page numbers. Any
information that is missing – which is often the case with older publications – should be
omitted without comment. Second and subsequent references to sources are made using
“short form” reference. References to entire books should omit page numbers, while
references to one or more pages should be indicated following the publishing
information.
It is no longer standard to use Latin terminology in notes, such as ibid., idem., op. cit.,
loc. cit, and others. Instead, use the short form reference method discussed below.
1. Single-author books
Book entries are written as a single sentence separated by commas. Title are capitalized
and italicized (underlining is also acceptable provided it is consistent throughout the
paper), with subtitles separated by a colon. The publishing information (city: publisher,
year) is placed in parentheses. If the reference applies to the entire book, no page number
is necessary. Otherwise, put the relevant page number(s) after the year of publication. It
is not necessary to use the abbreviation “p.” or “pp.”
1
Susan Scott Parrish, American Curiosity: Cultures of Natural History in the Colonial British
Atlantic World (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006), 87.
Second and subsequent references to sources are made using “short form” reference,
which include the author’s last name, a short version of the title, and the page number.
5
Parrish, American Curiosity, 43-56.
Books that were written in previous centuries should indicate as much information as is
available, and retain original spelling.
18
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
6
Thomas Harriot, A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia (Frankfort, 1590).
[Note that there is no publisher information available. If the year of publication is written in
Roman numerals, such as “MDXC”, this should be changed to standard numbers (1590).]
Some books have national, corporate, or organizational authors.
23 Great Britain, Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts, Calendar of the Manuscripts of the
Most Honourable the Marquis of Salisbury, Preserved at Hatfield House (London: Her Majesty’s
Stationer’s Office, 1885), 45. [Note that the highest authority, “Great Britain”, is indicated first,
followed by the next highest authority, “Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts”.]
2. Multi-author books
For books with two or three authors, the authors’ names should be listed as they appear
on the title page.
12 Robin W. Winks and Lee Palmer Wandel, Europe in a Wider World, 1350-1650 (New York:
Oxford University Press, 2003), 11-15.
16 Winks and Wandel, Europe in a Wider World, 17.
If there are four or more authors, use “and others,” which is preferable today to the Latin
“et al”, although both are considered correct.
8
John Briggs and others, Crime and Punishment in England: An Introductory History (London:
UCL Press, 1996), 7.
13 Briggs, Crime and Punishment, 56.
3. Edited Collections and Essays or Documents Within
For complete references to collections of essays or primary sources, indicate the editors.
2
Andrew Barrett and Christopher Harrison, ed., Crime and Punishment in England: A Sourcebook
(London: UCL Press, 1999), 45-47.
4
Barrett and Harrison, eds., Crime and Punishment, 68.
When a specific essay or document is being referred to in an edited collection, refer to the
author and title of the specific work you are using. The title is placed in quotation marks,
while the book’s title is italicized.
16 Alfred W. Crosby, “Infectious Disease and the Demography of the Atlantic Peoples,” in The
Atlantic World in the Age of Empire, ed. Thomas Benjamin and Timothy Hall (New York:
Houghton Mifflin, 2001), 169-179.
18 Crosby, “Infectious Disease,” 172.
19
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
4. Translated and Edited books
For books that have been edited or translated, place the original author first and indicate
the name of the translator after the title.
23 Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (New
York: Random House, 1995), 27.
56 Hugo Grotius, The Free Sea, ed., David Armitage, trans. Richard Hakluyt (Indianapolis: Liberty
Fund, 2004), 45.
5. Multi-Volume or Multi-Edition Works
For books with multiple volumes, indicate the total number of volumes after the title and
indicate the specific volume number being used before the page number.
9
William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols. (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1979), 1: 153.
11 Blackstone, Commentaries, 2: 345.
When there are multiple editions of a book, indicate the edition being used, using “2d
ed.”, “3rd ed.”, etc., “rev. ed.” for revised editions, or “enl. ed.” for enlarged editions. It is
not necessary to indicate the edition number if it is the first.
4
Thomas H. Greer and Gavin Lewis, A Brief History of the Western World, 8th ed. (Toronto:
Nelson, 2002).
7 Greer and Lewis, Brief History, 56.
6. Journal Articles
For journal articles that are in print, place the title of the article in quotations marks and
underline or italicize the title of the journal. Note the volume (30), year of publication,
and pages numbers following a colon. Most journals number pages consecutively
throughout an entire year; when a journal begins each issue with page one, it is necessary
to indicate the issue number after the volume (30:3).
5
William V. Flores, “New Citizens, New Rights: Undocumented Immigrants and Latino Cultural
Citizenship,” Latin American Perspectives 30 (2003): 87-100.
8
Flores, “New Citizens, New Rights,” 89.
Some journals have distinct series, which reuse the volume numbers. In such cases, the
series must be noted.
15 Carole Shammas, “The Space Problem in Early United States Cities,” William and Mary
Quarterly, 3rd. ser., 57 (2000): 505-542.
20
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Journal articles accessed electronically that originally appeared in print (that is, in a
permanent, paper version) should be referenced as above, using the original page
numbers. Correct page numbers will be found by downloading the Adobe Acrobat
version of the on-line file (.pdf) instead of the .html file. When in doubt, consult the
printed version. Journals that are only available on the world wide web should be
referenced as follows:
48 Daniel Gorman, “Wider and Wider Still?: Racial Politics, Intra-Imperial Immigration and the
Absence of an Imperial Citizenship in the British Empire,” Journal of Colonialism and Colonial
History 3.3 (2002), muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_colonialism_and_colonial_
history/toc/cch3.3.html (accessed 25 August 2007), para. 31.
Note that because this article is not elsewhere available, the URL (uniform resource
locator), date the article is accessed, and paragraph number is cited.
7. Book Reviews
Book reviews are referenced by the author of the review, not of the book being reviewed.
13 Heather J. Coleman, review of Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times:
Soviet Russia in the 1930s, by S. Fitzpatrick, Canadian Journal of History 36 (2001): 151-152.
15 Coleman, review of Everyday Stalinism, 151.
8. Plays, Poems, and Biblical References
Well-known plays, poems, and Biblical references that carry act, scene, section, or
chapter, line, or verse numbers do not need to be referenced with publication information
unless the edition being used is important to the discussion of the texts.
12 William Shakespeare, King Lear, 2.3.12-16.
15 John Milton, Paradise Lost, book 1, lines 670-74.
18 King James Bible, 1 Corinthians 13.9.
9. Magazine or Newspaper Articles
References to magazine articles are similar to journal articles:
47 Heather Pringle, “Alberta Barren,” Saturday Night, June 1997: 30.
If you are citing from a regular feature without a title, capitalize the feature title, but do
not underline, italicize or use quotations marks.
37 Currents in the News, U.S. News and World Report, 11 February 1980, 5.
Citations to newspapers include the month and day of the issue but can leave out page
numbers. Cite the edition if the paper has more than one (ie. morning and evening).
21
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
21 Oliver Moore, “Rumsfeld Glad to Flee Washington for Baghdad,” Globe and Mail, May 13,
2004. [Note: the article The is left off the title Globe and Mail.]
If you accessed the article online, provide the URL. Use only the main entrance to the
newspaper or service if the full URL will quickly become invalid, as is usually the case.
19 Alan Fram, “Official Says War Budget to Exceed $50B,” Yahoo! News, March 13, 2004,
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/.
10. Articles in Encyclopedia or Dictionaries
The use of dictionaries and encyclopedia should be avoided unless these works have
acquired a certain historical importance (such as the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia
Britannica.) When they are used, however, cite the entry as clearly as possible.
32 William B. Robison, “Kidd, William (ca. 1645-1701),” in Absolutism and the Scientific
Revolution, 1600-1720: A Biographical Dictionary, ed. Christopher Baker (Westport: Greenwood
Press, 2002), 205.
34 Robison, “Kidd, William,” 205.
Well-known reference books do not need to be accompanied by the facts of publication,
unless there is potential for confusion. Give the source and the title of the entry, but
eliminate the author of the entry even if it is known.
45 Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, “Dee, John.”
67 Dictionary of Canadian Biography, “Russell, Charles.”
11. Dissertations and Theses
Dissertation and thesis titles are placed in quotations marks because they are not
published. Also include the type of thesis and the place and year of completion.
3
Meshal Al-Rabeaa, “Orphaning the Victorian Child: A Study in Eight Victorian Novels (PhD
diss., University of Calgary, Canada, 2007), 87.
6
Al-Rabeaa, “Orphaning the Victorian Child,” 32.
12. Electronic Resources
Documents on the internet should include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and date
on which the material was accessed.
19 Martin Luther, “Address to the Nobility of the German Nation (1520),” in Internet Modern
History Sourcebook, www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/luther-nobility.html (accessed 15 May 2005).
22
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
References to documents on CD-ROMs should include as much information as possible.
It is often impossible to put a page number; this may be omitted silently or some other
method of locating the document (such as that indicated below) may be possible.
14 Bartholomew Las Casas, “Amerindians and the Garden of Eden,” Western Civilization
Documents CD-ROM (Upper Saddle: Prentice Hall, 2004), doc. 10.4.
13. Archival and Manuscript Sources
The method of referencing a source from an archive differs depending on the archive
where it is housed and the collection in which it is found. In general, the document should
be described as fully and as consistently as possible with the Chicago Manual of Style, by
citing author, title, the archive where the document is housed, and its shelfmark (library
locator information). When in doubt, refer to the archive’s website or to books that
reference documents from that archive. Unknown information may be silently omitted.
The following example is taken from a document housed in the British Library.
34 John Dee, “Brytanici Imperii Limites,” British Library, Additional Manuscript 59681, fols. 21-
25.
39 Dee, “Brytanici Imperii Limites,” fol. 37.
14. Interviews
If you are referencing an interview that was broadcast or published, the citation should
include the name of the person interviewed, the title of the interview (if applicable), the
interviewer’s name (if this was you, write “interview by the author”), the medium (e.g.
book, television show) where the interview appeared, and the date of the interview.
42 Margaret Thatcher, “Britain’s Iron Lady,” interview by Barbara Frum, The Journal, Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation, 27 September 1983.
45 Isaac Bashevis Singer, interview by Harold Flender, in Writers at Work: The “Review”
Interviews, ed. George Plimpton, 5th ser. (New York: Viking Press, 1981), 85.
References to interviews that you have conducted or that have not been published or
broadcast are referenced as follows:
34 Horace Hunt [pseudo.], interview by Ronald Schatz, tape recording, 16 May 1976, Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg. [Note: in this example, the interview has been
deposited in an archive.]
35 Karl-Heinz Mehlan, interview by Annette F. Timm, Anna-Sabine Ernst and Donna Harsh, tape
recording, Rostock, Germany, 1 June 1996.
15. Explanatory Notes and Multiple References
Occasionally, it is desirable to place narrative in notes in order to contextualize a
discussion without delaying the development of your argument.
23
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
45 Clinton L. Evans, The War on Weeds in the Prairie West: An Environmental History (Calgary:
University of Calgary Press, 2002). Evans argues that there is a fundamental economic
relationship between people and weeds in subsistence or non-capitalist societies. This relationship
determined both how agricultural societies developed and how weed control would be conducted.
It is sometimes necessary to put several sources into one footnote, if all the sources refer
to the material that is being referenced. In such cases, works should be separated by semicolons.
17 Glenn Burgess, The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political
Thought, 1603-42 (University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993), 34-56; Brian
Levack, The Civil Lawyers in England, 1603-1641: A Political Study (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1973), 43-67; Johann Sommerville, “English and European Political Ideas in the Early
Seventeenth Century: Revisionism and the Case of Absolutism,” Journal of British Studies 35
(1996): 168-94.
16. Additional Material
For detailed explanations on how to reference additional material, such as music scores,
videos, documentaries, and legal cases, consult one of the sources listed in the Further
Resources section below.
Proper Bibliographical Format
A bibliography is a list of all the sources that were consulted in the course of researching
and writing the essay. As a result, some works might be cited in the bibliography that are
not otherwise referenced in the essay. Do not, however, include clearly irrelevant
material in the bibliography. The main difference between notes and bibliographical
entries is how the information is presented, rather than what is presented. Entries are
alphabetized by the author’s last name or institution and the various elements of the
reference are separated by periods instead of commas. Short titles are not used in
bibliographies and page ranges are only used for journal articles. Primary and secondary
sources are usually separated, although it is not always necessary to separate them further
unless an extensive list of sources has been used. What follows is an example of a
properly-formatted bibliography, using some examples from the previous section.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Manuscript [use only when manuscript sources have been consulted]
Dee, John. “Brytanici Imperii Limites.” British Library, Additional Manuscripts 59681.
Great Britain Public Record Office. Patent Roll, C/66.
——. State Papers, 14/164. [Note: The three-em dash (——.) is used when the author’s name is the
same as the last entry, in this case, “Great Britain Public Record Office”.]
24
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Electronic [use only when electronic sources have been consulted]
Las Casas, Bartholomew. “Amerindians and the Garden of Eden.” In Western
Civilization Documents CD-ROM. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004).
Luther, Martin. “Address to the Nobility of the German Nation (1520).” In Internet
Modern History Sourcebook, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/luther-nobility.html
(15 May 2004).
Printed [use only when printed sources have been consulted]
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 4 vols. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1979. [Note that the publishing information is not placed in parentheses.]
Harriot, Thomas. A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia.
Frankfort, 1590.
Great Britain Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts. Calendar of the Manuscripts
of the Most Honourable the Marquis of Salisbury, Preserved at Hatfield House. London:
Her Majesty’s Stationer’s Office, 1885.
Secondary Sources
Brown, Christopher L. “The Politics of Slavery.” In The British Atlantic World, 1500-
1800, ed. David Armitage and Michael Braddick. New York: Palgrave, 2002.
Coleman, Heather. Review of Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times:
Soviet Russia in the 1930s, by S. Fitzpatrick. Canadian Journal of History 36 (2001):
151-152.
Flores, William V. “New Citizens, New Rights: Undocumented Immigrants and Latino
Cultural Citizenship.” Latin American Perspectives 30 (2003): 87-100.
Foucault, Michael. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan.
New York: Random House, 1995.
Gorman, Daniel. “Wider and Wider Still?: Racial Politics, Intra-Imperial Immigration
and the Absence of an Imperial Citizenship in the British Empire.” Journal of
Colonialism and Colonial History 3.3 (2002),
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_colonialism
_and_colonial_history/toc/cch3.3.html (accessed 25 August 2007).
Greer, Thomas H. and Gavin Lewis, A Brief History of the Western World, 8th ed.
(Toronto: Nelson, 2002). [Note that only the first author’s name is reversed.]
25
University of Calgary The History Student’s Handbook
Parrish, Susan Scott. American Curiosity: Cultures of Natural History in the Colonial
British Atlantic World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
Winks, Robin W., and Lee Palmer Wandel. Europe in a Wider World, 1350-1650. New
York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Annotated Bibliographies
Professors will sometimes request that an annotated bibliography be submitted, either
with the essay or with a research proposal that precedes the essay. This uses the same
format as that shown above, except that each entry is accompanied by a brief statement
summarizing the source and showing why it is being used in the paper. Annotations
should be approximately 25 words in length. For example:
Sharpe, James. The Bewitching of Anne Gunter: A Horrible and True Story of
Deception, Witchcraft, Murder, and the King of England. New York: Routledge,
2001. Using the evidence of a case that came before the Court of Star Chamber in
1611, Sharpe shows the importance of contemporary belief systems and the
workings of the law in early modern England.
Further Resources
The most recent edition of the following resources should be consulted for additional
guidelines on writing and referencing history essays.
Chicago Manual of Style: The Essential Guide for Writers, Editors, and Publishers. 15th
ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
Marius, Richard, and Melvin E. Page. A Short Guide to Writing About History. 4th ed.
New York: Longman, 2002.
Northey, Margot, and Lorne Tepperman. Making Sense: A Student’s Guide to Research
and Writing. 3rd ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Rampolla, Mary Lynn. A Pocket Guide to Writing in History. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/St.
Martin’s, 2004.
Storey, William Kelleher and Towser Jones. Writing History: A Guide for Students.
Canadian ed. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 6th
ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
26
