| Marking Criteria (RUBRIC) – NUR332 – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health and Cultural Safety – Assessment Task 3 – (2000 word) Written Assignment.
Student Name:
|
|||||
| Student Name: | |||||
| Student Number:
|
|||||
| Assessment Criteria | HD
20 – 17 |
DN
16.5 – 15 |
CR
14.5 – 13 |
PS
12.5 – 10 |
FL
9.5 – 0 |
| Demonstrate an application of knowledge by linking the impacts of Assimilation policies to the health status of Australian Women today.
(Relating to topics outlined in Step 4 of the Task 3 Criteria) (20%) |
A comprehensive and systematic exploration of detailed discussion linking the impacts of Assimilation policies to the health status of Australian Indigenous women today. Full exploration and critical evaluation of the determinants of health. | Systematic exploration of detailed discussion linking the impacts of Assimilation policies to the health status of Australian Indigenous women today. Explores and attempts critical comment of the determinants of health. | A balanced summary of evidence of linking the impacts of Assimilation policies to the health status of Australian Indigenous women today. Explores the determinants of health. | Main points outlined. Evidence linking the impacts of Assimilation policies to the health status of Australian Indigenous women today. Reference to the determinants of health. | Insufficient engagement with concepts. There is no evidence of the understanding of the Impacts of Assimilation policies on the health status of Australian Indigenous women today.
. |
| 20 – 17 | 16.5 – 15 | 14.5 – 13 | 12.5 – 10 | 9.5 – 0 | |
| Provision of sound rationale in support of position taken in response to the statement. Incorporating cultural safety principles.
(20%) |
A comprehensive knowledge of reasoning and sound rationale in support of position taken in response to the statement. Fully justified position with reference to extensive current relevant evidence-based information. | Provides knowledge of key issues and sound rationale in support of position taken in response to the statement. Justified position with reference to current relevant evidence-based information. | Demonstrates the significance of rationale in support of position taken in response to the statement. | There is evidence of rationale in support of position taken in response to the statement. | Insufficient evidence of sound rationale in
support of position taken in response to the statement. |
| 10 – 8.5 | 7.5 – 8 | 7 – 6.5 | 6 – 5 | 4.5 – 0 | |
| Written expression, structure and presentation
(5%)
AND
Citation and referencing using Harvard – Please see referencing resource on BB. (5%) |
Exceptional presentation assessment, well organized.
Key concepts are integrated and logically presented. Virtually flawless grammar and spelling.
Recognised in-text citation/referencing style. Referencing format used consistently and accurately. |
Presentation requirements met. Well-structured. Links paragraphs in logical sequence. Few flaws in spelling, grammar.
Recognised in-text citation/referencing style. Referencing format used consistently with few flaws. |
Some presentation errors or
mission in structure, spelling and grammar.
Recognised in-text citation/referencing style. Referencing format used inconsistently with significant flaws. |
Basic requirements for presentation of academic work. Written expression, grammar and referencing require further development.
Recognised in-text citation/referencing format used inconsistently with significant flaws.
|
Presentation and written expression require significant development. Key presentation elements are missing. Evidence of plagiarism/ collusion.
In-text citation/style referencing unrecognized or omitted. |
| Overall Grade:
Comments: Marker: |
|||||
