Moral and Ethical Framework Appraisal

Moral and Ethical Framework Appraisal/ Week 6-(2-2-18)

Moral and Ethical Framework Appraisal

Final Paper: Find an ethical problem or issue in a profession in which you are interested or that you expect to enter yourself.

Part 1 Present a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict, and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. State clearly what the ethical problem is that you will be dealing with. This section should be neutral and objective. Shorter is better than longer in this section. Do not try to solve the problem or present your opinion(s) in this section.

Part 2 Discuss three different ethical positions or theories that you would apply. Also reference any relevant sections of your professional code of ethics; e.g., APA, ACA, etc. Do not present your opinion(s) on the problem or attempt to solve it here.

Part 3 In this  final section, present what you think would be the best solution to the problem, along with your reasons for your solution and why you think your solution is superior to the others that might be given. This is the section in which you should discuss your problem and present your opinion(s). Longer is better than shorter in this section. Say what ethical theory or theories and professional-code sections you are using to arrive at your solution.

This should be a 2,100- to 2,800-word (or 6- to 8-page) paper, excluding cover page, abstract, and references, using APA formatting.

Assignment Rubric

Description: Final Paper: Find an ethical problem or issue in a profession in which you are interested or that you expect to enter yourself. Part 1 Present a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict, and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. State clearly what the ethical problem is that you will be dealing with. This section should be neutral and objective. Shorter is better than longer in this section. Do not try to solve the problem or present your opinion(s) in this section. Part 2 Discuss three different ethical positions or theories that you would apply. Also reference any relevant sections of your professional code of ethics; e.g., APA, ACA. etc. Do not present your opinion(s) on the problem or attempt to solve it here. In your final section, present what you think would be the best solution to the problem, along with your reasons for your solution and why you think your solution is superior to the others that might be given. This is the section in which you should discuss your problem and present your opinion(s). Longer is better than shorter in this section. Say what ethical theory or theories and professional-code sections you are using to arrive at your solution. This should be a 2,100- to 2,800-word (or 6- to 8-page) paper, excluding cover page, abstract, and references, using APA formatting.

Total Possible Score: 30.00

Presents a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. States the ethical problem clearly

Total: 6.00

Presents a comprehensive summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. States the ethical problem clearly.

Presents a detailed summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. States the ethical problem clearly.

Presents a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. States the ethical problem clearly

Presents a brief summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. States the ethical problem.

Does not present a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s).

Discusses three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply, referencing any relevant sections of the professional code of ethics.

Total: 6.00

Thoroughly discusses three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply, referencing any relevant sections of the professional code of ethics.

Discusses in detail three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply, referencing any relevant sections of the professional code of ethics.

Discusses three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply, referencing any relevant sections of the professional code of ethics.

Briefly discusses three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply, referencing any relevant sections of the professional code of ethics.

Does not discuss three different ethical positions or theories that the student would apply

Presents a solution to the problem, along with reasons for the solution and the ethical theory or theories and professional code sections used. Includes why the student’s solution is superior to the others that might be given.

Total: 6.00

Presents a comprehensive solution to the problem, along with reasons for the solution and the ethical theory or theories and professional code sections used. Includes why the student’s solution is superior to the others that might be given.

Presents a detailed solution to the problem, along with reasons for the solution and the ethical theory or theories and professional code sections used. Includes why the student’s solution is superior to the others that might be given

Presents a solution to the problem, along with reasons for the solution and the ethical theory or theories and professional code sections used. Includes why the student’s solution is superior to the others that might be given.

Nominally presents a solution to the problem, along with reasons for the solution and the ethical theory or theories and professional code sections used. Includes why the student’s solution is superior to the others that might be given

Does not present a solution to the problem or reasons for the solution.

Research

Total: 6.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials.  The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

 

3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials.  The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials.  The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

Writing and Organization

Total: 6.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.

 

 

4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.

3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.

2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.

1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.

Powered by Powered by Logo

Please follow and like us: