Infographic about Met-enkephalin
Category Component Unsatisfactory (0pt) Poor (1pt) Acceptable (2.5 pts) Good (3.5 pts) Excellent (5 pts)
Format Audiovisual Appeal
No use of figures/animations additional to text/audio. No storyboard apparent
Figures/animations are of good quality: clear, no watermarks. Use of repeated figures. Audio is engaging. Storyboard somewhat apparent
Eye‐catching figures/animations of good quality. Good use of figures, repeated only if necessary. Storyboard somewhat apparent. Audio engaging
Outstanding and original figures/animations. Clearly related to a storyboard. Audio very engaging
Format Clarity
Figures/animations are completely unrelated to text/voice. Text/audio is not understandable on its own
Figures/animations show vague and not readily apparent correlation to text/audio. Text/audio is somewhat understandable on its own
Figures/animations show clear correlation to text/voice. Text/audio is somewhat understandable on its own
Figures/animations show clear correlation to text/audio. Text/audio is understandable on its own
Figures/animations show outstanding correlation to text/audio. Text/audio is understandable on its own. Figures/animations are understandable on their own
Sources References No citations included
At least 2 sources are given, not clearly identified and format is not correct
At least 3 consistent sources are given, but not clearly related to specific information, format with some mistakes
At least 3 consistent sources are given clearly related to specific information, format with some mistakes
3 or more consistent sources are given related to specific information, format no mistakes
Language Clarity Text/audio is not understandable
Text/audio is convoluted, hard to understand
Text/audio is well organized in coherent sentences. Somewhat difficult to follow the sequence of sentences.
Text/audio is well organized in coherent sentences. Easy to follow the sequence of sentences.
Text/audio is well organized in coherent sentences. Easy to follow the sequence of sentences. Text/overall provides one cohesive message.
Language Age appropriate
Language used is too complex for a 5‐7th grader to understand
A big part of the language used is not explained in a way that a 5‐ 7th grader would understand
Most concepts are explained at the required level. Research of what language would be appropriate for that age somewhat apparent
Concepts are explained at the required level. Research of what language would be appropriate for that age somewhat apparent
All concepts are explained at the required level. Research of what language would be appropriate for that age completely apparent.
Accuracy of information
Figures/Animati ons
Full of mistakes, no clear source
Some ambiguities exist. Figures are obscure
Most figures/animations have a source that backs up their accuracy. Figures are self explanatory
All figures/animations have a source that backs up their accuracy. Figures are self explanatory
All figures/animations have a source that backs up their accuracy. Figures have a clear purpose in the overall story.
Accuracy of information Text/Audio
Full of mistakes, no clear source
Some ambiguities exist. Text/audio are obscure
Most tex/audio have a source that backs up their accuracy. Sentences are self explanatory
All text/audio have a source that backs up their accuracy. Sentences are self explanatory
All text/audio have a source that backs up their accuracy. All sentences have a clear purpose in the overall story.
Accuracy of information
General message
Vague and wrong message and conclusions
Slightly unclear, not enough description of ideas
Good use of language to convey accurate message and conclusions
Clear, concise language that conveys accurate message and conclusions
Engaging language to convey accurate and memorable message and conclusions