Get Cheap Essay Help Online-According to Daniel McCool in Native Waters, what is the Winters Doctrine? Think about what “reserved water rights” means to tribes on reservations.
Objective: Produce a 4-5 page essay covering the readings and lectures, based on the set of questions provided below.
Format: Double-spaced, 1” margins, 10-12 pt font.
Citations: Footnotes and endnotes are required. Please note, you may utilize any of the standard citation formats (MLA, APA, Chicago), including international options. However, do not use in parentheses () citations.
Questions: According to Daniel McCool in Native Waters, what is the Winters Doctrine? Think about what “reserved water rights” means to tribes on reservations. Why have tribes opted for making water settlements instead of going to court to protect their water rights? Think about what McCool says about settlements as a form of conflict resolution. What has been the response to these settlements from the tribal community, be they tribal government officials or not? Look at some of the vignettes for examples.
Required readings:
Books amazon.com, and elsewhere):
Hazel W Hertzberg, The Search for an American Indian Identity: Modern Pan-Indian
Movements (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981).
Vine Deloria, Jr, Behind the Trail of Broken Treaties: An Indian Declaration of
Independence (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1985).
Sarah Deer, The Beginning and End of Rape: Confronting Sexual Violence in Native
America (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015).
Daniel McCool, Native Waters: Contemporary Indian Water Settlements and the
Second Treaty Era (Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 2002).
Articles (pdf files provide via BlackBoard):
David Wallace Adams, “Schooling the Hopi: Federal Indian Policy Writ Small, 1887- 1917,” Pacific Historical Review, Vol 48, No 3 (August, 1979): 335-356.
Leonard A Carlson, “Federal Policy and Indian Land: Economic Interests and the Sale of Indian Allotments, 1900-1934,” Agricultural History, Vol 57, No 1 (January, 1983): 33-45.
Note. “Tribal Self-Governance and the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.”
Bradley G Shreve, “‘From Time Immemorial’: The Fish-in Movement and the Rise of Intertribal Activism.”
Wilcomb E Washburn, “The Historical Context of American Indian Legal Problems,” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol 40, No 1 (Winter, 1976): 12-24
