1. Use data to your advantage
Identifying the problem is the first step towards change. Statistics can shock governments into action. This was the case in Kiribati.
A 2008 study found 68 per cent of girls and women who had been in an intimate relationship had experienced some form of violence. This figure gave the government – with the help of women’s organisations, the UN and international aid agencies – the impetus to try to bring about change.
2. Build on existing systems
Governments don’t always have the money to invest in new programmes – this was certainly the case in Kiribati. Instead, they need to tap into existing systems.
Of course, the police, justice, health and social welfare sectors must first work together to respond to existing violence. But to stop violence before it starts, the everyday work of sectors such as education, health and labour needs to be harnessed – to help build environments where girls and women are respected as equals, and violence is not accepted.
In response to that 2008 report, Kiribati’s schools are now changing their curriculums to include teaching about respectful relationships, gender equality and preventing violence. They’re also training teachers to counsel students who have experienced violence, or are living with it at home. This provides children and young people with alternative models, and the skills they need to create non-violent and equal relationships of their own.
Continuing support from trained specialists and women’s organisations is crucial to the success of this approach. Tapping into the experience of organisations such as the Fiji Women’s Crisis Centre and the Tongan Women and Children’s Crisis Centre, Kiribati stakeholders are working hard to establish their first independent and multi-disciplinary Women’s and Children’s Support Centre.
3. Tackle wider inequality issues
Individual programmes will only help the participants. There needs to be a more co-ordinated approach to tackle gender inequality, gender stereotyping and social norms around violence.
In Kiribati, the changes to the education curriculum can be backed up by increasing girls’ participation in sports clubs or a social marketing campaign. For adults it could involve working with faith and other community leaders, or going from village to village educating people about law reform and gender equality – something the Women’s Development Division and Kiribati police are doing on the outer islands.
The idea is to reach out to boys and men, and to empower girls and women by giving them knowledge and tools to shape their own futures.
4. Monitor short- and medium-term success indicators
Reducing levels of violence takes a long time: even well-funded initiatives might take five to 10 years to make a real impact – and they need to be carefully monitored to make sure the impact is the right one.
This can make it tough to maintain momentum, so you need to look at how to measure the progress that comes before that. Attitudinal surveys are one way to assess smaller developments such as acceptance of the issue and changing attitudes to gender equality.
In Kiribati, they’re only just starting the long journey toward social change. The changes outlined in points 2 and 3 are still in their infancy, but by transforming practices that keep girls and women from fully participating in schools and workplaces, they’re starting to see the progress that unfolds when girls and women are full contributors.
After three years they’ve found that people are starting to see there’s a problem and that they can do something about it. That’s progress – and it’s helping to maintain the momentum for change.
5. Be prepared for a backlash
See backlash as a sign of success. It means that people sense that things are changing. Change is always worrying for some members of any community. In Kiribati, when the Women’s Development Division raised awareness about domestic violence, some people would say things like: “You’re ruining our women,” or “This is our culture,” but really they’re just reacting to a change in the status quo. Donors and decision-makers must be prepared for this, and see it as a sign of progress. That’s why point four is so important if you’re going to see change through.
Above all, community conversations and debate about these issues must be welcomed and facilitated – with girls and women having a clear voice. They’re the key to creating lasting change.
What have you learned about preventing violence against girls and women? Tell us on Facebook and Twitter
Find out more about programmes working to end gender-based violence
Forms Of Gender based Violence
Facts on Gender Based Violence
Forms of Violence against Women
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE is not an isolated, individual event, but rather a pattern of
perpetrator behaviors used against a victim. The pattern consists of a variety of abusive acts,
occurring in multiple episodes over the course of the relationship. Some episodes consist of a
sustained attack with one tactic repeated many times (e.g., punching), combined with a
variety of other tactics (such as name calling, threats, or attacks against property). Other
episodes consist of a single act (e.g., a slap, a “certain look”). One tactic (e.g., physical assault)
may be used infrequently, while other types of abuse (such as name calling or intimidating
gestures) may be used daily. Some parts of the pattern are crimes in most countries (e.g.,
physical assault, sexual assault, menacing, arson, kidnapping, harassment) while other
battering acts are not illegal (e.g., name calling, interrogating children, denying the victim
access to the family automobile). All parts of the pattern interact with each other and can
have profound physical and emotional effects on victims. Victims respond to the entire
pattern of perpetrators’ abuse rather than simply to one episode or one tactic.
PHYSICAL VIOLENCE
Physical abuse may include spitting, scratching, biting, grabbing, shaking, shoving, pushing,
restraining, throwing, twisting, slapping (with open or closed hand), punching, choking,
burning, and/or use of weapons (e.g., household objects, knives, guns) against the victim.
The physical assaults may or may not cause injuries.
TYPES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE
Sexual violence can take many forms and take place under very different circumstances. A
person can be sexually violated by one individual or several people (e.g. gang-rapes); the
incident may be planned or a surprise attack. Although sexual violence occurs most
commonly in the victim’s home (or in the perpetrator’s home), it also takes place in many
other settings, such as the workplace, at school, in prisons, cars, the streets or open spaces
(e.g. parks, farmland). The perpetrator of a sexual assault may be a date, an acquaintance, a
friend, a family member, an intimate partner or former intimate partner, or a complete
stranger, but more often than not, is someone known to the victim. There is no stereotypical
perpetrator; sexually violent men come from all backgrounds, rich and poor, academic and
uneducated, religious and non-religious. Perpetrators may be persons in positions of
authority who are respected and trusted (e.g. a doctor, teacher, tourist guide, priest, police
The Health System Response to Gender-Based Violence in EECA: A programmatic package
2
officer) and thus less likely to be suspected of sexual violence. Sexual violence is common in
situations of war and armed conflict. Specifically, rape and sexual torture are frequently used
as weapons to demoralize the enemy; women are sometimes forced into “temporary
marriages” with enemy soldiers. Women who are incarcerated may be subjected to sexual
violence by prison guards and police officers. Other forms of sexual violence include, but are
not limited to:
sexual slavery; sexual harassment (including demands for sex in exchange for job promotion
or advancement or higher school marks or grades); trafficking for purposes of forced
prostitution; forced exposure to pornography; forced pregnancy; forced sterilization; forced
abortion; forced marriage; female genital mutilation;
(WHO Guidelines for Medico-legal care of victims of Sexual Violence, page 7 to 8)
PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE
There are different types of psychological assaults.
Threats of violence and harm
The perpetrator’s threats of violence or harm may be directed against the victim or others
important to the victim or they may be suicide threats. Sometimes the threat includes killing
the victim and others and then committing suicide. The threats may be made directly with
words (e.g., “I’m going to kill you,” “No one is going to have you,” “Your mother is going to
pay,” “I cannot live without you”) or with actions (e.g., stalking, displaying weapons, hostage
taking, suicide attempts).
Emotional violence
Emotional abuse is a tactic of control that consists of a wide variety of verbal attacks and
humiliations, including repeated verbal attacks against the victim’s worth as an individual or
role as a parent, family member, friend, co-worker, or community member. In domestic
violence, verbal attacks and other tactics of control are intertwined with the threat of harm in
order to maintain the perpetrator’s dominance through fear. While repeated verbal abuse is
damaging to partners and relationships over time, it alone does not establish the same
climate of fear as verbal abuse combined with the use or threat of physical harm.
Emotional abuse may also include humiliating the victim in front of family, friends or
strangers. Perpetrators may repeatedly claim that victims are crazy, incompetent, and unable
“to do anything right.” Not all verbal insults between partners are acts of violence. In order
for verbal abuse to be considered domestic violence, it must be part of a pattern of coercive
behaviors in which the perpetrator uses or threatens to use physical force.
The Health System Response to Gender-Based Violence in EECA: A programmatic package
3
Isolation
Perpetrators often try to control victims’ time, activities and contact with others. They gain
control over them through a combination of isolating and disinformation tactics. Isolating
tactics may become more overtly abusive over time. Through incremental isolation, some
perpetrators increase their psychological control to the point where they determine reality for
the victims. Perpetrators’ use of disinformation tactics such as distorting what is real through
lying, providing contradictory information, or withholding information is compounded by the
forced isolation of the victims. For example, perpetrators may lie to victims about their legal
rights or the outcomes of medical interventions. While many victims are able to maintain
their independent thoughts and actions, others believe what the perpetrators say because the
victims are isolated from contrary information. Through his victim’s isolation, the
perpetrator prevents discovery of the abuse and avoids being held responsible for it.
Use of children
Some abusive acts are directed against or involve children in order to control or punish the
adult victim (e.g., physical attacks against a child, sexual use of children, forcing children to
watch the abuse of the victim, engaging children in the abuse of the victim). A perpetrator
may use children to maintain control over his partner by not paying child support,
threatening to take children away from her, involving her in long legal fights over custody, or
kidnapping or taking the children hostage as a way to force the victim’s compliance. Children
are also drawn into the assaults and are sometimes injured simply because they are present
(e.g., the victim is holding an infant when pushed against the wall) or because the child
attempts to intervene in the fight.
USE OF ECONOMICS
Perpetrators control victims by controlling their access to all of the family resources: time,
transportation, food, clothing, shelter, insurance, and money. He may actively resist the
victim becoming financially self-sufficient as a way to maintain power and control.
Conversely, he may refuse to work and insist that she support the family. He may expect her
to be the family “bookkeeper,” requiring that she keep all records and write all checks, or he
may keep financial information away from her. In all instances he alone makes the decisions.
Victims are put in the position of having to get “permission” to spend money on basic family
needs. When the victim leaves the battering relationship, the perpetrator may use economics
as a way to maintain control or force her to return: refusing to pay bills, instituting legal
procedures costly to the victim, destroying assets in which she has a share, or refusing to
work “on the books” where there would be legal access to his income. All of these tactics may
be used regardless of the economic class of the family.
The Health System Response to Gender-Based Violence in EECA: A programmatic package
4
Source: Ganley, Anne L.(1998): Understanding domestic violence. In: Warshaw, C., &
Ganley, A. (1998): Improving the health care response to domestic violence: a resource
manual for health care providers. Futures Without Violence: Health Care,
http://www.futureswithoutviolence.org/section/our_work/health/_health_ma…
