essay your future profession With a length of 600-800 words, this editorial work encourages you to make links between the works read during the session and your curriculum. The text will consist of a written letter to a fictitious representative of the field to which you are focusing and in which a problematic dimension of the profession is called into question in the light of a striking aspect of a work. It is a matter of examining the possibility of literature to make us think about life in general and thus go beyond the binding framework of the book. Your text should be divided into three main parts: 1 – Presentation of what you think is a problem in the profession you are hoping to occupy. It would probably be easier to identify a problem related to the authoritative mentality (or even ideology) in the field. You must insist on the negative aspects of the application of this mentality, ideally by basing your argument on concrete examples (which can be invented, but plausible). 2- Presentation of a literary work to the program in which an ideology similar to the one you have just criticized is also presented in a negative way. You must insist, as you did in your oral presentation, on the (thematic and formal) means used by the author to condemn the mentality in question. 3. Always in the light of the work, show how a change of mentality (in your field) could be beneficial. You can base your argument on a solution proposed in the work, on the positive impact the work has had on society or on a plausible extrapolation from the book. Tip: If you are having difficulty getting started by identifying a problem in your domain, start by reviewing your notes about the works studied during the session; You will probably find at least one element that can apply to your situation. The points will be distributed as follows: Presentation of the problem / 5 Presentation of the work / 5 Benefits of Change / 5 Rhetorical Strategies * / 5 * Remember that this is to convince the recipient: Logos (logic, reasoning and mode of construction of the argument): formal and thematic references to works and citations from serious reference works (with sources);
