Dissertation Writers: Describe the Pros and Cons of Fossil Fuels 

Dissertation Writers: Describe the Pros and Cons of Fossil Fuels

Use the Template that is attached/ APA Format/ 5 pages/ 12 credible references with links

Topic: Pros and Cons of Fossil Fuels

 Submitting a rough draft of a paper or project gives the writer a chance to receive feedback on the paper and make revisions in anticipation of the final draft submission. A rough draft does not need to be a polished work but it should still adhere to APA guidelines and include all necessary components as listed in the Environmental Issue Project – Introduction from Module 02.

Must include the required headings and content as listed above.

Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.

Must utilize assessment manuals as necessary to support the inclusion and results of the assessments.

Must use a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources, at least two of which must be from good sources.

Must document all sources in APA style

Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style

Pros and Cons of Fossil Fuel- Rough Draft

Running title: final project 5

To drill or not to drill in ANWR (PUT YOUR TITLE HERE)

Aisling Kane (YOUR NAME)

Rasmussen College

Author’s Note:

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the two-sided debate of drilling in the Arctic wildlife refuge. (YOUR TITLE) Written for Instructor Aisling Kane, on the date July 17, 2017 (your date) course G328, Human Uses of the Environment.

Title of your research (i.e Global warming: Fact or fiction)

The Controversy (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

: Identify the controversy

Go into detail on what the two sides are and what you plan to research

(minimum one page you can remove this part once you have your one page minimum)

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

The Major Players (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

(minimum one page)

· Who is involved? Why are they involved?

· Go into detail on all the players involved in both sides of this debate

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Important Facts:

· (minimum one page)

· State relevant facts concerning the issue. Try to separate fact from opinion. Try not to show your own bias. Properly use APA citations

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Side One: (please keep this heading for rough draft and final)

· (minimum one page)

· Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources

Yellow HIGH light part can be removed once you have your research and information

Side Two: ((please keep this heading for rough draft and final))

· Arguments; state briefly and cite your sources

HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information

Your Opinion and Rationale (please keep this heading for rough draft and final))

(minimum one page)

· I believe that…, We should…, I feel that… Use supporting arguments and

· rationale. What arguments would you use to present to those who disagree with you? Cite all of your sources.

· This is where you can tell me which side you agree with and why

HIGH lighted part can be removed once you have your research and information

References:

· Alphabetize your sources. Make sure there are sources representing both sides of the issue.

Your references must match your intext citations

Examples of how I want your references done

Lamb, G. (2005, September 27). Science and politics: a dangerous mix. Christian Science Monitor97(213), 11-13. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Academic Search Premier database.

. When Scientists Politicize Science. Regulation29(1), 28-34. Retrieved April 10, 2016, from Business Source Complete database.

Link to article

Author last name is always first (this is how they are put in order)

Date of publication

Name of article and publication

DATE IT WAS RETRIEVED BY YOU

From where it was retrieved and the link

Please follow and like us: