Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?
Coursework Help- Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?
