CONNECTING TERRACYCLE, INC. TO STUDENTS

IV. CONNECTING TERRACYCLE, INC. TO STUDENTS

The first day of the course is a perfect opportunity to introduce the stu-

dents to TerraCycle’s business (or some other business chosen by the in-

structor) and to discuss some of the small-group exercises that the students

can expect to see throughout the semester. A discussion of instructor

expectations for the successful completion of group exercises by the stu-

20For just a few of the many articles that can be assigned to students as additional reading, see Ken Belson, Kept Out of Landfills and Reborn as a Bag, N.Y. TIMES, Sept. 23, 2008, available at http:// www.nytimes.com/2008/09/24/business/businessspecial2/24worm.html; Gwendolyn Bounds, A Growing Dispute: Fertilizer Start-Up Uses Web as a Defense, WALL ST. J., May 22, 2007; Mike Hof- man, Legal Lemons, PR Lemonade, INC. MAGAZINE (June 2007); Paul Smith, How to Recycle the Un- recyclable: Terracycle Shows the Way, Eco-entrepreneurs, Aug. 21, 2008, http://ecopreneurist.com/ 2008/08/21/how-to-recycle-the-unrecyclable-terracycle-shows-the-way/; OfficeMax Unveils Line of TerraCycle’s Made-from-Waste Office Products, GreenBiz.com (May 2, 2008), http://www. greenbiz.com/news/2008/05/02/officemax-unveils-terracycle-recycled-office-products.

21TOM SZAKY, REVOLUTION IN A BOTTLE: HOW TERRACYCLE REDEFINES GREEN BUSINESs (2009).

22You Tube, http://www.youtube.com, is a host site for user-generated videos. The site in- cludes network and professional content, as well as amateur videos. A short video that was part of the BBC World broadcast can be located at http://www.youtube.com/watch? v-FM6sxZFvJ5c. Related segments: Turning Worm Poop Into Organic Fertilizer; TerraCycle BBC World; Eco-Tech TerraCycle; TerraCycle Today Show; and TerraCycle Bottle Brigade Video; all available on YouTube.

86 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

dents should also be covered on the first day of class. The Internet can be

accessed in the mediated classroom to add visual experiences to this dis-

cussion. TerraCycle’s Web site23 is a useful way to introduce the students to

this business. The video embedded in the TerraCycle Web site is a great

introduction to the students who founded this business and their trials and

tribulations in starting and running their business. After viewing the video,

students can form groups, consisting of four or five students, to list some of

the ways they believe that laws affect them as college students and ways

they believe that TerraCycle’s business would be affected by laws. The

groups report their lists to the entire class, serving as an ice breaker and

leading to classroom discussion.

Two professors teaching Legal Environment of Business to three sec-

tions of about eighty total students first used TerraCycle as their continuous

business example during the fall semester of 2008. It was used again during

the spring semester of 2009. The professors designed the small-group as-

signments to be completed by the student groups within fifteen to twenty

minutes. While the students are working in groups, the instructor rotates

from group to group, providing small-group personalized instruction to

the students. Upon completion of the various group assignments, the entire

class participates in short discussions regarding their analysis of the legal

dilemmas. The small-group exercises often give the students the confi-

dence they need to participate in the classroom discussions on both days

when there is a group activity and on days when there is not. Grading of

these group exercises consists of evaluating the solutions and the students’

application of law to the facts. Each exercise is worth up to five points per

student if successfully completed. Approximately fifteen group exercises

were used throughout the semester. As the title of this article indicates, it

isn’t easy being green, but the time and effort is well worth it.

V. UTILIZATION OF TERRACYCLE FOR LESSONS IN THE CLASSROOM

As an introduction to law, many legal environment of business textbooks

begin with a classification of laws into groups like public versus private,

criminal versus civil, and substantive versus procedural. With a focus on

23See http://www.terracycle.net (last visited Mar. 29, 2009).

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 87

TerraCycle and its business model, one of the first substantive class exer-

cises can involve a close look at a number of different state bottle deposit

laws. Here is an example of such an exercise:

TerraCycle uses recycled soda bottles for most of its fertilizer products.

Many states have bottle deposit laws. Let’s look at some bottle deposit

laws. Attached are summaries of the bottle deposit laws in California,

New York, Michigan, and Iowa. Also attached is a ‘‘frequently asked

questions’’ sheet about bottle deposit laws. Review the attached materials

and answer the following questions:

1. What are the purpose(s) of the laws?

2. Circle your answer. Classify the bottle deposit laws as:

Criminal/civil

Substantive/procedural

Public/private

3. What are the similarities among the laws?

4. What are the differences among the laws?

5. What beverage container is only covered in the California law and not

the others?

This exercise gives the students an opportunity to apply the classification

of law concepts to actual laws. It also provides a comparison of the various

ways different states have chosen to reduce waste. Students begin thinking

about different state laws, their application to business, and sustainability

issues.

One of the next major topics in most Legal Environment of Business

course is a discussion of the judicial system and alternative dispute reso-

lution. The lawsuit by Scotts against TerraCycle, Inc. alleged claims of false

advertising, trade dress infringement, trade dress dilution, unfair compe-

tition, and unjust enrichment against TerraCycle. The relief sought was

both equitable and legal in nature in that injunctive relief and monetary

damages for lost profits were sought. TerraCycle filed an answer with

affirmative defenses and counterclaims and demanded a jury trial. While

the case was pending, a Web site24 was available to view the actual com-

24The original blog site, http://www.suedbyscotts.com, is no longer a functioning link because, as part of the settlement agreement, TerraCycle was required to remove it and post the terms of the agreement between the two companies instead. See Wendy Bounds, When It’s Good to Be

88 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

plaint filed in the case, as well as the answer and all of the exhibits. A copy

of the complaint filed by Scotts against TerraCycle can be provided to the

student groups.25

First and foremost, the students can discuss the merits of filing a lawsuit

versus using an alternative dispute resolution method to resolve a dispute

between two companies. Students can look at how businesses can best resolve

disputes and the strategies that a business should follow if litigation is inev-

itable. Second, in trying to understand the jurisdiction of various courts, this

case can be used to illustrate many of the jurisdictional concepts such as state

court versus federal court subject matter jurisdiction. Students can see how

jurisdiction is pleaded in a legal document, what these legal documents ac-

tually look like, how a business would ask for damages and remedies from

the court, the statements made of each party’s legal rights, and other relevant

information obtained from actually viewing legal documents in their entirety.

Students can see how counterclaims and affirmative defenses are pleaded

and can explore the various stages in civil litigation.

Subsequent to the filing of the pleadings in the case, the parties mu-

tually decided to settle the dispute. Settlement of disputes is quite com-

mon,26 and this provides such an example for students. Students can

continue the study of this case to discuss the concept of corporate social

responsibility. Both businesses and their strategies can be compared and

their effects on customers, employees, shareholders, and communities can

be evaluated. As corporations have been in the media spotlight for many of

their unethical behaviors, ethical decisions of business are also important.

What concerns did each of the businesses take when developing the mis-

sions of each? What concerns did Scotts have in determining to litigate the

resolution of their dispute against TerraCycle? The strategy of posting the

litigation on the Internet for all to view is an interesting angle used by

TerraCycle. As a relatively new company, TerraCycle did not feel that it

Sued, WALL ST. J., Sept. 27, 2007, available at http://www.terracycle.net/media/07-09-27_wsj/ 07-09-27_wsj.htm.

25We have pdf files of the complaint and related exhibits.

26According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, civil litigation in state courts represents a major component of the total number of cases filed each year. Civil lawsuits outnumber their criminal counterparts by nearly two mil- lion cases. Of all of the civil cases filed each year, less than three percent actually will go through a trial. The remaining ninety-seven percent settle their disputes out of court. See http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/cjrd.txt (last visited Mar. 29, 2009).

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 89

had the funds necessary to defend their actions. It started a campaign on

the Internet to generate additional funds as well as to inform the public of

the lawsuit. This strategy is usually not one used by corporations. Com-

paring these strategies can lead to classroom discussion on decisions to

litigate, goodwill, and media attention.

Another of the group exercises brought reality into the classroom,

combining the issues of service of process and litigation with a constitutional

issue. TerraCycle hosts an annual ‘‘graffiti jam’’ event. During this event,

graffiti artists give demonstrations and compete. A fictitious summons and

complaint (attached as Appendix A) was prepared in which issues of due

process and free speech regarding the graffiti jam were involved. The issues

were based on a similar case that can be provided to the students to assist

them with their analysis.27 A template for the summons was found on the

Internet from the state of New Jersey’s Web site.28 Two university police

officers were given the documents in advance of class. The officers served the

summons and complaint on the class by selecting a student as a represen-

tative of the class, checking that student’s identification, and completing the

affidavit of service. Our students reacted with surprise and bewilderment

about what was going on, and then amusement. Then the students broke

into groups to examine the documents and determine the legal claims of

both the plaintiff and the defendant.

Appendix B contains an exercise on mediation. It involves resolving a

dispute regarding the negotiation of a lease extension of the property in

which TerraCycle does its business. After a discussion of the different forms

of alternative dispute resolution methods, the students form small groups.

The instructor selects a mediator in each group and determines which

students within the group will represent TerraCycle and Urban Properties

(the property owner). The fact sheet is distributed to each group, with

special facts for each party to the mediation.

Appendix C contains a group exercise where the students examine

the facts surrounding a slip and fall to determine if negligence has oc-

curred. Appendix D contains two fact patterns with questions about the

performance of contracts. Appendix E contains an exercise where the stu-

dents examine a state criminal statute and apply it to a fact pattern. It also

contains a state civil wrongful termination claim. The standard of proof in a

27Vincenty v. Bloomberg, 476 F.3d 74 (2d Cir. 2007).

28See http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/forms.htm (last visited Mar. 29, 2009).

90 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

criminal case versus a civil case is also illustrated by this exercise. Appendix

F contains an exercise used as a follow-up to the lecture regarding various

federal statutes that affect the workers in the workplace. Students examine

several work-related legal issues to quickly spot the applicable statute.

Other group exercises using TerraCycle as the affected business in-

cluded hypothetical issues involving administrative law, contract forma-

tion, agency, and business formation. Utilizing the same company

throughout the semester saves class time, as the students did not have to

read lengthy descriptions of businesses each time a group activity was as-

signed in class. TerraCycle can be used in examinations to assess students

in the application of the legal principles. Appendix G includes some sam-

ple essay questions.

Many lessons can be learned by students studying this case and using it

to illustrate legal concepts. Students will develop their analytical and critical

thinking skills to formulate well-reasoned discussions regarding multiple

legal and ethical topics based on this company and its strategy when faced

with litigation. These group activities give students knowledge of the com-

plexity of the law in its application to factual situations involving business, an

awareness that the law rarely provides black and white answers, and an ap-

preciation that the law is constantly evolving and changing.

VI. STUDENT IMPRESSIONS

Feedback from the undergraduate business law students shows students

found the group exercises enjoyable and challenging. Students in three sec-

tions of the Legal Environment of Business course were surveyed regarding

the use of the semester-long case study. The survey included the following

statements:

1. The TerraCycle business and law-related exercises helped me under-

stand the legal environment of business.

2. The expectations in the class exercises were made clear by the professor.

3. I think the points assigned to the exercises were fair in relation to the

total points available in the course.

4. I think the exercises were graded fairly.

5. There were too many class exercises related to TerraCycle.

6. I would rather work on the TerraCycle exercises as homework instead

of in class.

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 91

7. I would rather work on the TerraCycle exercises in a group rather

than alone.

8. The actual Scotts Miracle-Gro v. TerraCycle complaint we talked about in class helped me understand the first step in the litigation process.

9. The service of the City of Trenton v. TerraCycle complaint by the Bradley police officer helped me understand how service of process occurs.

10. I would rather have class exercises about different businesses instead

of just TerraCycle.

The students were given the following rating scale: (e) strongly agree, (d)

agree, (c) neutralFneither agree nor disagree, (b) disagree, and (a) strongly disagree. The results were compiled both as individual sections

of the course and as a group (Figure 1). As a whole, the students in the

three different sections of the Legal Environment of Business courses be-

lieved that the group exercises related to the TerraCycle case study were

helpful to them (Figure 2). The students also preferred working in groups

to resolve exercises as opposed to working individually. The students pre-

ferred to do these exercises in class rather than assigned to them as home-

work.

25

30

35

40

45

0

5

10

15

20

Help Understand

Too Many Homework Group Complaint helped

Service helped

Different businesses

P er ce

n t

Questions

Series1 Series2 Series3 Series4 Series5

Figure 1: Question Responses

92 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

Strongly Disagree 5% Disagree

7% Neutral

2%

Agree 25%

Strongly Agree 61%

Figure 2: Group Work Preferred (7)

Strongly Disagree 3%

Disagree 5%

Neutral 24%

Strongly Agree 25%

Agree 43%

Figure 3: Exercises Assisted Student’s Understanding (1)

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 93

Students were asked about two specific exercises they had completed

within groups during the semester. One exercise involved their study of

the actual complaint filed in the real litigation involving TerraCycle and

The Scotts Company LLC. Most students felt that this exercise was useful

to their understanding of the first step in the litigation process (Figure 3).

The second exercise involved the service of process upon the class of a

complaint by a uniformed university police officer. The students believed

that this service exercise was helpful in understanding how the service of

process occurs. Although this survey of students was very basic, it showed

that the students thought that the use of these in-class group exercises was

helpful to their understanding of the concepts of the course.

These surveys were conducted at the end of the semester. Future

classes will have surveys after completion of select exercises, rather than

waiting until the end of the semester. It is believed that students’ answers

will be more accurate when the exercise has just been completed and is

fresh in their minds.

VII. CONCLUSION

The new trend is to buy organic items and have a sustainable business. Uti-

lizing this company and its legal hurdles will engage the students with a

current and interesting business model and help them better understand the

application of legal principles to real-world situations. Student evaluations

have indicated that they have enjoyed the utilization of this case to discuss

many of the legal concepts in class. The instructor of a Legal Environment of

Business course can use the facts of this case to further generate discussion in

other areas studied in class with ‘‘what if TerraCycle did this?’’ Active learn-

ing with a real business example is likely to be more effective in teaching the

legal concepts and making them memorable for the students.

APPENDIX A: JURISDICTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW EXERCISE

Based on the complaint below, first, state whether the court jurisdiction is

proper and why. Second, identify the constitutional issue in this dispute.

Next, provide the legal argument for each of the parties.

94 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

LAW DIVISION

Mercer County

City of Trenton, NJ,

319 East State Street

Trenton, NJ 08608 Docket Number: C:

Plaintiff, CV-00981-08

v. CIVIL ACTION

COMPLAINT

TerraCycle, Inc.

Defendant.

Plaintiff, City of Trenton, by its City Attorney, R. Denise Lyles, with its place

of business located at 319 East State Street, City of Trenton, County of

Mercer, State of New Jersey, complaining of defendant, states as follows:

1. Plaintiff is the City of Trenton, New Jersey.

2. Defendant is a business incorporated in state of New Jer-

sey and conducting business within the state.

3. On or about, August 15, 2008, defendant applied for a limited

special use permit from the City of Trenton for the purpose of

a festival to be held at 121 New York Avenue, Trenton, New

Jersey. The stated purpose was to celebrate the summer youth

program and be held on September 15, 2008.

4. Subsequent to August 15, 2008, the City of Trenton has

become aware that this festival has been promoted as

‘‘Terracycle’s Annual Worm Poop Graffiti Jam.’’

5. Pursuant to N.J. City Code, section 42-12, 1-2, no person

shall be in possession of objects for the purpose of produc-

ing graffiti. The festival will be in violation of said city code.

6. On or about August 30, the City of Trenton notified de-

fendant that the limited special use permit was rescinded/

revoked, and all further action for the activity should be

stopped.

7. It is the belief of the City of Trenton that the defendant is

attempting to continue with its activities on September 30,

2008.

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 95

WHEREFORE, plaintiff requests:

1. The payment of all legal expenses incurred by the City of

Trenton due to this litigation, including reasonable attor-

ney fees and costs of this suit;

2. An order enjoining the defendant from its activities that

promote graffiti;

3. Damages; and

4. Any other relief as the court may deem proper.

CERTIFICATE OF NO OTHER ACTIONS

I certify that the dispute about which the City of Trenton is suing is not the

subject of any other action pending in any other court or pending arbi-

tration proceeding to the best of my knowledge and belief. Also, to the best

of my knowledge and belief no other action or arbitration proceeding is

contemplated. Further, other than the parties set forth in this complaint, I

know of no other parties that should be made a part of this lawsuit. In

addition, I recognize my continuing obligation to file and serve on all par-

ties and the court an amended certification if there is a change in the facts

stated in this original certification.

Dated: 09/10/08 Signature: _____________________

R. Denise Lyles, City Attorney

JURY DEMAND

The plaintiff demands trial by a jury on all of the friable issues of this

complaint, pursuant to New Jersey Court Rules 1:8-2(b) and 4:35-1(a).

Dated: 09/10/08 Signature: _____________________

R. Denise Lyles, City Attorney

APPENDIX B: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION EXERCISE

Terracycle, Inc. and its landlord, Urban Properties, are having a dispute.

First, the lease is about to expire and the parties are attempting to nego-

tiate a new lease for the property located at 121 New York Avenue, Tren-

ton, New Jersey. Here are the issues remaining:

96 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

1. Rent amount. The current lease indicates a quarterly lease payment of

$7,000. Terracycle wants to continue with this rent amount. Urban

Properties wants the rent to be $14,000, due to the increased per square

foot rental prices in the area. Terracycle argues that the rent prices have

gone up due to its impact on the community.

2. Parking. The current lease allows for 20 parking spaces at a nearby lot

also owned by Urban Properties. The price per month for individuals

purchasing parking passes from Urban Properties has gone from $50 to

$150. Terracycle wants 5 more parking spaces and Urban wants to only

include 10 in the new lease.

3. The current lease does not talk about community events or celebrations

held at the property. Urban Properties wants to include a provision

limiting gatherings to the employees, owners, and their families. Ter-

racycle does not want a limitation due to their quite popular event, the

Graffiti Jam.

In addition to the lease renewal, there is currently litigation pending be-

tween the parties. At the 2007 Graffiti Jam, police and the city of Trenton

issued tickets for various city ordinances that were violated. Urban Prop-

erties received several citations due to this event occurring on their prop-

erty. As a result, a lawsuit is pending wherein Urban Properties is suing

Terracycle for the payment of all legal fees and citations due to the event.

Of course, Terracycle doesn’t want to pay.

This is a mediation exercise. One person in the group will be the me-

diator. The others will divide into the two sides, Urban and Terracycle.

All issues should be attempted to be resolved. Any resolutions will be

reduced to writing and agreed to by both sides. Creativity and in-depth

analysis of the issues will receive full credit.

Secret Facts for TerraCycle: TerracCycle has plans to expand. In this expansion, they anticipate

hiring several new employees. In order to attract these new people, Ter-

raCycle wants to offer parking spaces in this busy urban area. Individual

parking prices would be $1501.

In addition to the Graffiti Jam, TerraCycle is going to be having

several recycling celebrations in the upcoming two years. They want to

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 97

make sure that their leases allow for these celebrations. One such

celebration would include several top musical artists to come to the

warehouse and festival. You can be creative with these festivals and

the intentions in the lease. TerraCycle does not want to loose this

location!

Secret facts for Urban Properties: Urban has a prospective new buyer for the property. The

potential buyer does not want a long-term lease on the premises.

Urban has just purchased the two pieces of property adjacent to this

property.

APPENDIX C: NEGLIGENCE EXERCISE

Could This Be a Case of Negligence?

As we know, TerraCycle’s business is based on products made from waste.

TerraCycle uses garbage to feed its worms and the worms in turn pro-

duce their product. The product is bottled and sold in stores throughout

the United States and Canada. TerraCycle gets much of its food for its

worms from the waste products of local restaurants.

Assume the following fact pattern:

Anna Peale applied on-line for a position working in the corporate

office of TerraCycle as a video intern for the summer of 2009. Anna

interviewed for the position at the corporate office in Trenton, New

Jersey. Upon entering the building, she slipped and fell. Immediately, she

felt pain, looked down and saw that her ankle was likely broken.

Anna also noticed a couple of black, flattened out, and gritty banana

peels underneath her. She had slipped on bananas. An ambulance

was called, she went to the hospital, and had to have surgery to set

the ankle break. She never did have an interview. Several weeks have

passed and Anna has not received any information about the internship

position. Anna called TerraCycle inquiring about the internship to find that

it had been filled. Anna also had to miss classes and exams due to this injury.

Could this be negligence? Discuss.

98 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

APPENDIX D: CONTRACT PERFORMANCE EXERCISE

Question 1:

Phil is a tax accountant. He promises TerraCycle that he will complete its

corporate tax return, the individual income tax returns for each of its

officers, prepare the W-2’s that will be distributed to TerraCycle’s em-

ployees, Forms 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Returns and the

Form 940, Employer’s Annual Federal Unemployment Tax Return. Ter-

raCycle’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2008. TerraCycle has agreed to

pay Phil $1,200.00 for this tax preparation package. Phil has completed

the Forms 941 for three quarters (based on the calendar year) and no

other work. Yesterday, Phil called Tom and Jon, the founders of the

company, and informed them that as of January 31, 2009, he would not

be able to finish completion of the work. He anticipates that he can finish

the Form 940 for the year ending December 31, 2009, Form 941 for the

last quarter of 2008, and the W-2’s, but no further returns. TerraCycle

has already paid $600.00 to Phil. Tom called ABC Accounting and a price

of $2,000 was quoted to prepare the corporate income tax return and

$500 for each individual tax return. What should TerraCycle do? Explain

your answers, keeping in mind the following:

a. Is this substantial performance or a material breach of contract?

b. What affect does Phil’s telephone call have on this situation?

c. Does TerraCycle still have to pay the remaining $600?

d. How would you measure the damages, including the types of damages?

Question 2:

Jon wrote a $500 check to Phil as a deposit on Phil’s 240Z car. The memo

section of the check read: ‘‘Deposit on 1978 240Z car of Phil Mole. Sale

price $4,500.’’ Phil initialed the memo section. When Jon returned the

next day with the remaining $4,000, Phil said, ‘‘Sorry, I sold the car for

$4,000 cash yesterday and sent your check back via mail.’’ The cheapest

240Z Jon can find is $5,200. What are Jon’s rights? Discuss, keeping in

mind the following:

a. Was a contract formed?

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 99

b. Are there any Statute of Frauds problems?

c. Could Jon collect any damages?

d. Are consequential damages available?

e. Are incidental damages available?

APPENDIX E: BUSINESS CRIME AND BUSINESS TORTS

Facts:

TerraCycle uses wood pallets to move their finished products into trucks

for shipping. After much use, the pallets develop cracks or break making

them dangerous to use when carrying a full load. The damaged pallets

have been piling up in a corner of the warehouse.

TerraCycle has just entered into an agreement with the City of Trenton

Park District. The park district has equipment to grind tree limbs into

mulch and has agreed to take the damaged pallets and grind them up for

mulch. The mulch is available free to Trenton residents who bring their

own truck to haul it away.

TerraCycle’s warehouse employees have seen the damaged pallets collect-

ing in the corner and haven’t been informed of the plans for the pallets.

Frank, one of the employees, decides to take a few of the damaged pallets

to use for firewood for a bonfire and cookout he is planning at his home.

Frank loads several into his truck at the end of his shift. One of Frank’s

coworkers, Ted, sees Frank load the pallets into his truck. Ted has always

disliked Frank and decides to call the police and tell them Frank is stealing

the pallets. The police go to Frank’s house, find the pallets in his backyard,

and arrest him for theft.

TerraCycle is unhappy that one of their best employees, Frank, has been

arrested for taking the pallets. They are equally unhappy that Ted got the

police involved without talking to TerraCycle’s management first. This is

just the latest in a number of issues with Ted, which include absenteeism

and a poor attitude when he is at work. Ted is an at-will employee.

TerraCycle decides to fire Ted.

100 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

New Jersey law on theft:

§ 2C:20-3. Theft by unlawful taking or disposition

a. Movable property. A person is guilty of theft if he unlawfully takes, or

exercises unlawful control over, movable property of another with

purpose to deprive him thereof.

b. Immovable property. A person is guilty of theft if he unlawfully

transfers any interest in immovable property of another with purpose

to benefit himself or another not entitled thereto.

Definition of purposely: A person acts purposely with respect to the nature of his conduct or a result thereof if it is his conscious object to engage in

conduct of that nature or to cause such a result. A person acts purposely

with respect to attendant circumstances if he is aware of the existence of

such circumstances or he believes or hopes that they exist. ‘‘With purpose,’’

‘‘designed,’’ ‘‘with design’’ or equivalent terms have the same meaning.

Construction of statutes with respect to culpability requirements: Pre-

scribed culpability requirement applies to all material elements. When the

law defining an offense prescribes the kind of culpability that is sufficient

for the commission of an offense, without distinguishing among the ma-

terial elements thereof, such provision shall apply to all the material ele-

ments of the offense, unless a contrary purpose plainly appears.

Affirmative defense: It is an affirmative defense to prosecution for theft that the actor:

(1) Was unaware that the property or service was that of another;

(2) Acted under an honest claim of right to the property or service in-

volved or that he had a right to acquire or dispose of it as he did; or

(3) Took property exposed for sale, intending to purchase and pay for it

promptly, or reasonably believing that the owner, if present, would

have consented.

First Question Set:

Is Frank guilty of theft? Answer the following questions to make your de-

termination:

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 101

1. What is (are) the act(s) prohibited by the theft statute?

2. What is the mental state associated with theft?

3. Does the mental state apply to all the elements?

4. What must the state show to establish that Frank is guilty of theft?

Ted has consulted an attorney about his firing from TerraCycle. Terra

Cycle has just received a letter from his attorney claiming that TerraCycle

has committed the tort of retaliatory discharge because Ted was fired after

he called the police about Frank. The elements of retaliatory discharge are

as follows:

� Employee is discharged by employer � The discharge in retaliation for the employee’s activities � The discharge is in contravention of clearly mandated public policy

Second Question Set:

Is TerraCycle liable for the retaliatory discharge of Ted?

Answer the following questions to make your determination:

1. Did TerraCycle discharge Ted?

2. Was the discharge in retaliation for calling the police or did Terra-

Cycle have other legitimate reasons for firing him?

3. What is the clearly mandated public policy that would be involved?

Ted is calling himself a ‘‘citizen crime fighter.’’

APPENDIX F: EMPLOYEE WELFARE EXERCISE

From the various statutes dealing with employee welfare, select a statute

most relevant to the situation:

1. TerraCycle wants to close one of its production plants.

2. Two employees, one male and one female are hired on the same date

to feed the worms. One is paid a different hourly rate than the other.

102 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

3. TerraCycle’s employees have decided to organize a union.

4. TerraCycle wants to pay its employees $6.00 an hour to work.

5. TerraCycle wants to hire an after school student worker, age 16.

6. Who might be liable for the violation of #5?

7. Employees believe that they should wear goggles and protective

footwear.

8. Bob, the shift supervisor, slips on a banana peel near the worm trays.

9. Times are tough, Violet is permanently laid off.

10. Fred and his wife adopt a child.

APPENDIX G: SAMPLE ESSAY QUESTIONS

Question 1:

The restaurant located down the block from TerraCycle Inc., called

the Eco Street Restaurant, served patty melt sandwiches with sautéed

onions on them. The sautéed onions were stored in oil at the restaurant,

then heated in the microwave oven, and finally added to the sand-

wiches before serving them to customers. Unbeknownst to Eco Street,

the toxin botulism type A was growing in the onions, and was not de-

stroyed by microwaving the onions. Over 30 people were sickened by the

botulism (food poisoning). Now, think of the food as a product (it is a

product).

Which TWO causes of action, one based on contract theory and one

based on tort theory, would you suggest might be successfully used by

these victims against Eco Street restaurant? Discuss these two causes of

action and include the elements of each cause of action and how those

elements would be satisfied by the facts. Reach a legal conclusion for this

lawsuit by the customers.

2010 / It’s Not Easy Being Green 103

Question 2:

The State of New Jersey passed a law, ‘‘all stores, shops, saloons, and all

places of public business, licensed under the law of New Jersey, shall be

closed on Sunday.’’ The statute had 25 exemptions including drug stores,

hotels, restaurants, theaters, and the state fair. TerraCycle wants to chal-

lenge the Sunday closing law on its constitutionality. What constitutional

provisions would apply?

Question 3:

TerraCycle filed a complaint against the city of Trenton, NJ for the denial

of an application that TerraCycle submitted to the appropriate city office

for two permits. TerraCycle wanted to obtain the city’s approval for its

Annual Worm Poop Graffiti Jam. TerraCycle expected the best showing

ever by nationally known artists, local artists, and even was providing a

booth for those who wanted to try it for the first time. TerraCycle was

planning to hold this event in its parking lot and adjacent city park. The

city has been fighting local gangs and others to prevent the public de-

struction caused by graffiti. The city recently passed an ordinance fining

those who engage in any form of graffiti in the amount of at least $500 per

violation, including fines for those aiding in the perpetration of graffiti.

TerraCycle did not know anything about the passing of the local ordi-

nance. If they had, a company representative would have attended the

public hearings in objection to the proposed ban. TerraCycle submitted its

application on the afternoon of September 5 and it was stamped ‘‘denied’’

with a date of September 5 and no explanation. TerraCycle does not be-

lieve that a proper examination of its application was made by the city, thus

the filing of the complaint.

Discuss the merits of TerraCycle’s case for denial of due process and its

rights pursuant to the First Amendment.

Include any arguments against the positions that would likely be taken by

the city of Trenton. Include the necessary classifications, definitions, and

application of standards that the court may use in exercising judicial review

of these issues.

104 Vol. 27 / The Journal of Legal Studies Education

Copyright of Journal of Legal Studies Education is the property of Blackwell Publishing Limited and its content

may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express

written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Please follow and like us: