Canada-Upper Division Writing Papers:You should also consider opposing views and trade-offs associated with your position. Consider down-sides and why others may have opposing viewpoints.

Canada

Some provinces in Canada, including British Columbia, currently ban the purchase of private insurance for medically necessary services that are already covered by the public system.  Do you agree or disagree with this policy?  Should citizens be permitted to purchase private health insurance for services covered by the public system?  Should they be permitted to make additional payments to providers on top of the amounts paid by the public health insurance plan for covered services?  What was the intent of the policy?  What are the unintended consequences of prohibiting private payments?  What do you believe would be the outcome if individuals were permitted to pay privately?

Upper Division Writing Papers

Three papers will make up the remaining 150 points (one-third) of your course grade.  While there will be four paper topics available, you only need to complete three papers.  (If you choose to complete four, your lowest score will be dropped.)  The papers will be critical thinking papers worth 50 points each.  You will be given the opportunity for feedback and revision and may earn back up to 10 missed points from your initial submission.  Papers must be submitted electronically to Canvas by 11:00pm on the day they are due.  Since you have four paper options, late work is not accepted.  Failure to submit your work as a result of technological failure will not grant you an extension.  Submitting your work on time is your responsibility.  Extra credit cannot be applied to Upper Division Writing Papers or to satisfy the University’s “C-” requirement.

This course satisfies the University’s Upper Division Writing requirement.  In order to fulfill FSU’s Upper-Division Writing requirement, the student must earn a “C-” or higher in the course, and earn at least a “C-” average on the required writing assignments.  If the student does not earn a “C-” average or better on the required writing assignments, the student will not earn an overall grade of “C-” or better in the course, no matter how well the student performs in the remaining portion of the course.

Rubric

Paper Rubric

Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNormative Position

In your opening paragraph, you should state your normative conclusion on the topic. You should continue to defend and support your position throughout the paper.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The student’s normative position was clearly stated and defended.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The student’s normative position was somewhat stated and defended.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The student’s normative position was unclear or not defended.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpposing Views

You should also consider opposing views and trade-offs associated with your position. Consider down-sides and why others may have opposing viewpoints.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The student thoroughly discussed trade-offs and acknowledged opposing views.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The student somewhat discussed trade-offs and acknowledged opposing views.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The student did not discuss trade-offs or acknowledge opposing views

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEconomics

You should be familiar and demonstrate an appropriate understanding of introductory economic concepts such as opportunity cost, secondary effects, supply and demand as well as resource constraints.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The student demonstrated an understanding of economic realities, secondary effects, incentives, and resource constraints.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The student somewhat demonstrated an understanding of economic realities, secondary effects, incentives, and resource constraints.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The student did not demonstrate an understanding of economic realities, secondary effects, incentives, and resource constraints.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClass

You should incorporate class discussions and materials into your paper as appropriate.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The student correctly incorporated relevant information discussed in class.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The student somewhat correctly incorporated relevant information discussed in class.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The student included irrelevant or incorrect information or did not include information discussed in class.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStructure

Academic papers should be clearly structured with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The paper was appropriately structured with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The paper was somewhat structured but lacked or had a weak introduction, body, or conclusion.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper was not structured with an introduction, body and conclusion.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations

Cite yours sources using MLA formatting. Be sure to support your positive statements with your credible sources. Acceptable sources include widely known news outlets and their editorials (e.g. The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Economist), research institutions and think tanks (e.g. The Kaiser Family Foundation, The Cato Institute, The American Medical Association), and peer-reviewed research journals. Unacceptable sources include Wikipedia, Obamacarefacts.com, websites without verifiable or credible authors, and blog posts. Please feel free to ask for clarification. Failing to appropriately cite your sources is a violation of the academic honor code http://registrar.fsu.edu/bulletin/undergrad/info/acad_regs.htm.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

Two outside sources were appropriately cited using MLA formatting and a works cited page.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

There were some errors citing outside sources.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

Outsides source were not cited or no works cited page was included.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

You must cite at least two credible outside sources. Course materials and the textbook are not considered outside sources, but you are encouraged to incorporate them and appropriately cite them as needed. Avoid direct quotes and cite yours sources using MLA formatting. Failing to appropriately cite your sources is a violation of the academic honor code http://registrar.fsu.edu/bulletin/undergrad/info/acad_regs.htm.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The outside sources were credible, appropriate to the content and incorporated fluidly into the paper.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The outside sources were somewhat questionable or not incorporated fluidly into the paper.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The outside sources were not credible or inappropriate.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar

I encourage you to visit FSU’s writing center for writing assistance and to have another student proofread your paper before you submit it to Canvas. https://wr.english.fsu.edu/reading-writing-center.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The paper had no grammatical errors or typos.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The paper had one or two grammatical errors or typos.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper had more than three grammatical errors or typos.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

Your papers should be 700 – 1000 words (approximately 3 pages). Your name, title and works cited are not included in the word count. Please double space and use 12 point font.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The paper was between 700 and 1000 words.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The paper was less than 100 words short or long of the required length.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper was outside of the required word length.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTone

Your tone is your overall attitude toward your reader. Your tone should in all circumstances be consistent and respectful. Problems with tone arise most often from the use of slang expressions and the second person which you must avoid in academic writing.

5.0 pts

Full Credit

The paper took a consistent formal tone throughout.

3.0 pts

Partial Credit

The paper had one or two lapses in appropriate tone or the second person.

1.0 pts

Needs Improvement

The paper took an informal tone, incorporated slang expressions and/or used the second person.

5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0

Previous Next

Please follow and like us: